Man I wish it wasn't 12 a side. I don't see the point of that rule...why on earth do we need another player? What does an extra player bring to the game of cricket? Yes it gives one more player a go, but we shouldn't be handing out state berths willy-nilly. It just lengthens batting lineups, which is stupid because a) they've shortened the game by 5 overs and don't need more batsmen and b) it teaches the bad habit of putting less value on your wicket. I guess the administrators are hoping for more rash shots. Rash shots=money in their eyes...
But anyway, apart from the 12 players idea, I really like the changes. Don't want to come across as a pessimist...