symonds_sixes
Club Cricketer
I don't think you can split the two. Panesar bowled with plenty of spin and Vetorri was more accurate.
As has been pointed out, both had wickets turned down. Panesar had something like 12 deliveries which beat the bat or were edged, that is top class bowling. How you can say Panesar had wickets gifted to him and Vettori didn't is beyond me.irottev said:I don't think so. Lets hear the neutrals opinions. Vettori had an obvious edge turned down his last ball.
The commentators hinted at it. Panesar bowled far too wide and short. Vettori was pitching them much straighter and caused the batsmen much more trouble.
Considering England needed like 7 an over when Vettori started and they tried their hardest to score off him and couldn't. Panesar got gift wickets, two batsmen going for 6's. Vettori's first was brilliant and the second was from a poor shot, but hit middle stump.
I think it's quite obvious that Vettori has outbowled Panesar all series. Even Jeetan Patel has.
Now get over your Montymania.
At least with Afridi you know he's capable as well. A top score of 36 is hardly going to carry us to World Cup Glory.m_vaughan said:And Mal Loye is turning into another Afridi kind hit out or get out player. Atleast Afridi can bowl.
True. England need Trescothick back and fit and mentally prepared.MUFC1987 said:At least with Afridi you know he's capable as well. A top score of 36 is hardly going to carry us to World Cup Glory.
they know how to make plenty of ducks, good to see my boy tait in the sideGriffo said:How exciting Tait and Lee opening the bowling you guys better know how to duck
bonus point? makes no difference england wont taste victorym_vaughan said:Vettori is better but Monty is going to improve and has amazing potential. The number of catches the Kiwiz dropped towards the end was appauling andcost them the bonus point which may hurt them later on.
And Mal Loye is turning into another Afridi kind hit out or get out player. Atleast Afridi can bowl.
Stats can lie. And even if they dont, its only 5 runs. Don't be so pedantic.MUFC1987 said:Hmm, Vettori 2-40, Panesar 2-35 and people say how NZ have a better team, so I assume we're all agreed that Panesar was the better bowler today.
Considering NZ lost their game against Australia by 8 runs, small amounts make a big difference.cricketmad09 said:Stats can lie. And even if they dont, its only 5 runs. Don't be so pedantic.
irottev said:I don't think so. Lets hear the neutrals opinions. Vettori had an obvious edge turned down his last ball.
The commentators hinted at it. Panesar bowled far too wide and short. Vettori was pitching them much straighter and caused the batsmen much more trouble.
Considering England needed like 7 an over when Vettori started and they tried their hardest to score off him and couldn't. Panesar got gift wickets, two batsmen going for 6's. Vettori's first was brilliant and the second was from a poor shot, but hit middle stump.
I think it's quite obvious that Vettori has outbowled Panesar all series. Even Jeetan Patel has.
Now get over your Montymania.