Cricket 24 - General Discussion

Also licensing is half botched. World cup or ipl full licence would have been considered as licensing victory.
What will we do with the licence if we have such graphics and shot selection by the players and stumps are flying in the game? The LED stumps are much heavier than the simple ones, and they are flying in the game as if no one cares about them.
 
I would invite anyone who has an interest in the difference between gameplay and superficial graphical representation to have a look at Full Ace Tennis. The game is developed by one person in his bedroom and is about 300 mb.
It looks at first impressions pretty average. But the gameplay is superb and it draws you in and the immersion created by realistic game-play far far far outweighs any immersion benefit of having licences or correct bats or whatever.
The classic PES vs. FIFA analogy. Once you get a taste of PES's gameplay and feel, there's no going back and Merseyside Red won't seem that bad.
 
We now understand why there haven't been any screenshots. We have already played the game for years, so what we gon do with just a few screenshots?
I just wish they had put more effort into improving gameplay aspects instead of spending money on licensing, which surely cost a ton. Plus, these licenses hardly affect us since we already have a great community system.
 
Gaming industries a full scam at this point. There should be an independent testing board that checks for glitches, features ect and they decide if you game is different enough from it predecessor for you to release as a new game or it has to be advertised with a caveat advertised like "updated verion" or something. far too many games these days half ass a full price release and get away with it

This is such a gamer comment to make, my goodness. There’s plenty of great releases to call the industry a scam.

You have several people in this very thread criticise the game’s lack of new features and end with “I’ll still buy it”. Think that’s a better place to start for this revolution rather than some regulation body that will be paid off anyway if at all it’s feasible in the first place.
 
Looks like, Cricket 24 is the game which BA wanted to do with Cricket 22... hoping they fix all bugs found in C22...

ezgif.com-gif-maker.gif
This shot looks new...
 
One thing i wished i would not see in the new games was this diamond pattern outfield. I mean no way. Enough of this diamond pattern. This makes game look same and same and same.

Diamond pattern helps them hide the fact that their outfield graphics are simply 'trash.' If you look close enough at other patterns in the game - unfortunately not too close though - you will see that a small patch of a grass has been multiplied to make up a single infield and outfield, when you look at it from birds eye view it all looks like an astroturf, and when you play in the subcontinent, especially Pakistan, infield and outfield is substituted with wheat field. I guess they are trying to make it look more arid but the grasses in Karachi, Lahore, Multan, and few other places usually tend to be relatively green, not wheatish. India and BD tend to be greener. If Cricket'10 got the grass work right 14 years ago I fail to understand why Big Ant with all the latest technologies fails to do so. IMO, even that doomed Cricket'13 had better looking grass work. And their camera work was pretty good too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top