I'm going to have to assume you're a troll now. You're actually using a game made by a Sony second party developer as your example, a company with huge financial might behind it? It wasn't some minor title by an indie dev.
Getting beyond that, the physics and control don't look overly impressive, and the game is drastically less complicated. Tennis physics aren't hard to get right, having two-four people on a field isn't hard to get right. Like, I genuinely have no idea what point you're trying to make at this point. If you don't like DBC 17 for the reasons you're now getting into, then you clearly didn't like DBC 14 for the same reasons. If you don't like the series, why are you wasting your time at this point?
Do you want to know some games where you can power a ball into someone's face without appropriate reactions though? FIFA and PES, two of the biggest budget sports games out there. You want to know some glitchy games that generally take several patches to get right? FIFA and PES, though in all fairness PES has had a few good years on that front, and EA just don't care enough to fix such things anymore as long as that sweet ultimate team money is flowing in. This year alone though, both FIFA and PES have bugs, albeit rare, that involve a goal not being given if it enters at just the wrong angle against the post. This despite having absolutely enormous budgets. The licencing for Barcelona for PES alone is likely more than the lifetime budget for the Don Bradman series, and by an order of magnitude at that. FIFA spend likely more than that on marketing alone.
