I'm in agreement about Tremlett getting the nod, He's had a good season at Surrey and looked impressive against Australia A a couple of weeks back. He also appears to have a bit more about him these days than he did at Hampshire.
Is he too similar to Finn though? Will Bresnan be considered due to his batting ability?( hopefully we will continue to not require the tail to bat though
)
No, Tremlett is much more line and length than Finn, he may be tall, but that's about the only similarity. I'd definitely plump for Tremlett at Perth, he's had a good year at Surrey and I think he's a pretty good bowler.
Bresnan seems to have a good rep with the England management, and I'm not sure why. Maybe we're missing something? Sure, he can bat to a decent standard, but we need to take wickets with our 4 bowlers, not be worried about them getting runs, which to be honest, an 8-11 of Swann, Tremlett/Shahzad, Finn and Anderson is good enough.
Shahzad averages 29 with the bat in FC, albeit with quite a few not outs and over a short selection of matches, he still has 2 50s, with a best of 88. Likewise Tremlett has 7 50s at FC level. Either one is good enough for 9 and both are considerably better bowlers than Bresnan.
It's an interesting one, Tremlett is the safer option, but Shahzad is a really exciting prospect imo.
To get it on topic, this match provides a big opportunity for them, even if the words from Flower suggest he already knows who is playing, I am worried that is Bresnan given his test experience this summer.