blockerdave
ICC Chairman
Your hawk-eye looks like it needs some recalibrations if it reckons that's hitting the stumps......
It smashed his bails off and he was back in the hutch.
Your hawk-eye looks like it needs some recalibrations if it reckons that's hitting the stumps......
Vanuata have been put into bat by PNG so I ll have to tell you later once I bowl![DOUBLEPOST=1461758602][/DOUBLEPOST]
Vanuata have been put into bat by PNG so I ll have to tell you later once I bowl!
@blockerdave you are using the red ball in a two innings game right? I'm doing 40 over games with the white ball......
Just put a screamer down at second slip: batsman goes for an expansive drive off a ball that shaped away, outside edge that flew to second slip and I just couldn't react quickly enough....watched it about 10 times on the replay....booooootiful....
@blockerdave something I noticed from your pitch maps is that you had practically any hitting around the 3.5M mark. It's a difficult length to hit, but I found it to be the optimum length on hard wickets.
Tbh I've found the opposite, and back of a length gets the edges.
I'm playing on Veteran, and most of my play in the last 2 or 3 weeks has not been with reduced skills.
I'm finding bowling a good length most of the time with a few fuller and regular back of a length "effort" cutters and seamers has been very successful in getting all types of wickets plus edges that get wickets and drop short or fly for runs. It seems to be the back of a length effort ones that get most edges.
When you say back of the length what is that on the ticker? Short?