puddleduck
Chairman of Selectors
Unbelievable
It's almost as though Fletcher and Freddie are hoping that because it happened in 2005, it will happen now. As I seem to be saying all too often, I was the staunchest of supporters of Fletcher before this series, but the amount of baffling decisions that so far are not providing any benefits is staggering.
I can almost see his reasoning now.... "Well we collapsed in the last test without getting any wickets, so Giles really justified his place as a batsman. He has troubled Australia before as his bowling average of close to 60 shows, and considering he could chip in with 20 runs when we're 400 behind, I think we have to play him. Afterall Monty might help bowl them out, but if we do that who will chip in with 20 odd runs when we bat?"
"Oh and don't forget Giles has those incriminating pictures of me and that small child..." *
*last part may not or may not be true
It's almost as though Fletcher and Freddie are hoping that because it happened in 2005, it will happen now. As I seem to be saying all too often, I was the staunchest of supporters of Fletcher before this series, but the amount of baffling decisions that so far are not providing any benefits is staggering.
I can almost see his reasoning now.... "Well we collapsed in the last test without getting any wickets, so Giles really justified his place as a batsman. He has troubled Australia before as his bowling average of close to 60 shows, and considering he could chip in with 20 runs when we're 400 behind, I think we have to play him. Afterall Monty might help bowl them out, but if we do that who will chip in with 20 odd runs when we bat?"
"Oh and don't forget Giles has those incriminating pictures of me and that small child..." *
*last part may not or may not be true