thedon5
Panel of Selectors
Walker isn't good in attack either though. He's literally just pace, and hype. Hype because his 11/12 went OK. Johnson is better than him but still terrible defensively.
Walker isn't good in attack either though. He's literally just pace, and hype. Hype because his 11/12 went OK. Johnson is better than him but still terrible defensively.
Kristian Walsh said:There is little enigma regarding Glen Johnson, apparently. Glen Johnson is a very good footballer going forward. His defending, however, leaves a lot to be desired. His concentration is poor, his positioning is non-existent and his tackling is erratic. Until he improves on his defending ? and he is a defender, after all ? he can never be regarded as a quality full back. Perhaps he should play in midfield for Liverpool; perhaps he should not play for England at all.
Perception can sometimes be a footballer?s toughest opponent. The wizardry and majesty of a deft touch, or the brutality and barbarousness of an axe-like limb, is little compared to the challenge of shifting opinion. At least there is some sort of control over those. Just ask Johnson. The 28-year-old has spent the majority of his three years at Liverpool stopping those deft touches and dodging the executioner?s swing of a leg, but he hasn?t fully conquered the deft brutality of perception.
Now is the time to do so. Glen Johnson is a very good footballer going forward, and he is also, now, a very good defender; one of the most complete full backs in world football.