War
Chairman of Selectors
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Online Cricket Games Owned
After last night's relatively small crowd at Wembley I wonder if the public have simply lost interest in the England team. I wrote about it here. I personally think the England team should tour the country instead of being confined to Wembley all the time. It would give more people the chance to go.
Ye i guess technically they should, when ENG toured everywhere from 2000-2007 when the Old Wembley was destroyed it was cool. But i got a soft spot for Wembley, ever since i first went their during EURO 96.
Wembley is sort of unique of world football, Pele & many football greats referred to the "Old" Wembley as the cathedral of football. Plus I've heard many old times say those in EURO used to marvel & the stadium, especially during FA Cup which was once viewed as the biggest football tournament outside of the world cup.
So i don't mind us having it. But the problem i guess is the FA owning it & thus having so much depth to pay back since reconstruction that the team can't even go around the country for the odd occasion. Because for these dour EURO 2016 qualifiers, it would be perfect for ENG to play San Marino, Estonia in a small stadium somewhere.
Many major nations like Brazil, Argentina, Italy, France, Holland, Germany for eg have major stadium they used regularly in their capitals (except Brazil technically): Maracana, Monumental, Stadio Olympico, Stade de France, Amsterdam Arena, Olympic Stadium. But none of those countries FA's own those grounds, either a local club or some city municipality does.