I never said or doubted that he didn't speak out until after he'd been axed, we all know that who has been following the situation -
The Ashes 2013 - Nick Compton blasts England for his treatment, saying he didn't get a fair crack of the whip | Mail Online
Just i'm not sure what you are deducing as the reasoning for him being axed initially, because for/to me its fairly straightforward that his pointed criticism at the selectors & Flower (above) had everything to do with Carberry being in AUS now instead of him.
Compton did himself no favours criticising the selectors for his treatment, whether he had a point or not which I lean towards not because you simply can't have an opening partnership that doesn't last five minutes.
I know people on here have pointed to centuries made in games against the kiwis, but there was the Ashes approaching and they couldn't risk a continuation of the weak form he was showing - 54 runs at 9.00. As it happens the decision was vindicated, Root scored 339 runs in 10 innings @ 37.67 while stepping up to the opener spot, and helped himself to three wickets
Compton - last six innings/partnerships
13 vs NZL - 8 run opening partnership, England were 72/5
2 vs NZL - 2 run opening partnership, England were 90/4
16 vs NZL - 43 run opening partnership, England were 67/2
15 vs NZL - 36 run opening partnership, England were 36/2
1 vs NZL - 11 run opening partnership, England were 67/3
7 vs NZL - 72 run opening partnership, England recovered
An averaging opening partnership of 28.67 or which Compton contributed 9 runs. It wasn't like he wasn't spending time at the crease, 224 balls faced in those six innings and yet despite THREE TIMES playing 45+ balls he still couldn't get past 16.
When someone ties themselves up in a knot trying but failing to find form, then the selectors have to make a decision. It was affecting him, the team and he had to go. In 5/6 of those innings England got into difficulty, those positions are not ones England could afford to keep getting into and something had to give.
You could argue Bairstow was lucky, lucky indeed he wasn't opening, but Compton is now 30, Bairstow not long 24 so time on the latter's side. Putting Compton at 29 down the order was not going to make a lot of sense, people point to his two centuries yet don't put two and two together to conclude that actually sets expectations of him higher and room for failure lower - especially at his age.
Bairstow only averaged 29.00 in the Ashes, but chalked up 2/3 of the runs in his first Ashes knock that Compton did in his last six innings, an innings which helped England recover from 124/4 (Root 30, Trott 48) and add 89 runs before he was out to take England to 213/8 before the last two wickets went for just two runs - England eventually won by 14 runs.
Anyway, I am critical of England's openers in this warm up match, should have retired out once they'd reached hundreds, especially Carberry as he'd scored runs in the previous warm up match.
If England didn't do their homework then they need shooting, they should always look at the weather forecast before any game and adjust plans accordingly. You can't know your openers will score hundreds, but you can work out from weather forecasts when they should retire out if the rain does arrive, or at least know how much time you might expect.
Sloppy from England, if players are out of form because others hogged time at the crease then it could prove costly - as could lack of overs bowled by main bowlers. Sure you can't take the weather for granted, but there is no need for centurions to INDULGE in 150s during warm up games. They'll be saying they need a rest next