Saw this chart on Jarrod Kimber's podcast - run rates when a team has scored 500. They're more than one run higher than anything that's come before. It's not just about chasing big scores now. Maybe they'll never get close to that again but I can't see why they wouldn't unless teams decide to set very defensive fields earlier.I don't think this is strictly true. I remember the Aussies in 2000s playing aggressive cricket too. Whilst England's current run rate is around one more than the Aussies managed during that period I'd still wait and see how successful this approach is on unfriendly pitches before heralding a new era.
What's been covered up (no doubt by the English camp who wants opponents to just think they're all vibes) is this side battling through the trying periods of a test. They haven't been always successful at it but they've shown a restraint and willingness to grind through tougher periods in a single match that was lacking in previous regimes due to a sheer lack of confidence. Baz has brought about that change and that has indeed unlocked this side. Another thing I like is that the focus is now on the next match (not even the next series) rather than everything being a buildup to the Ashes like it was in the past.
The main question going forward is how the side will respond if they are subjected to these tougher periods throughout the entire test or even a series. Will their spin attack be able to carry them on Indian pitches? Will their pacers be fit to last through an entire Ashes series on Australia and be effective still? Will a bowling attack without Anderson and Broad be as strong in NZ and South African conditions? Can Pope show the type of resilience that Root and Bairstow have done and can Stokes elevate himself from being a man who's only patient on big occasions to someone who can do this consistently in every series without buckling under pressure?
The constant narrative of last summer was "well they did it against New Zealand, they won't be able to do it against India" then "they did it against NZ and India but they won't be able to do it against South Africa". They lost one match and just carried on in the next game.
I certainly agree there might be tough series but I don't think the attitude will change. They will back players and the method. Can it really get much worse than the last tour of India or Australia? If they go down fighting, trying to play in style then that'd be far more on brand with this team.
You say the focus isn't on the The Ashes, but next summer will be the time at which this is all judged. If we win the Ashes and do it like they have been doing then it'll all be worth it. If we lose then the critics might jump out to criticise it.
There's also been a filtering through into county cricket already of 'this is how England play now', as happened with the limited overs side. So you have players wanting to show that they can fit in. Duckett said yesterday that seeing what was happening was an inspiration to free himself up a bit more in the summer because he wanted to be in this team. Players like Sibley, Hameed, Jennings all playing with more intent and at higher strike rates. This is Brook's second test match and he's broken the record for most runs scored in an over (by and Englishman) twice and scored at 132.
I'd also say, other than absolute spin friendly conditions, are there any conditions that are outside of England (Dukes, green pitches, clouds) that are more difficult?
Whatever happens, it's certainly going to be entertaining to watch.