Some more ridiculous umpiring.
Until this test match I've not seen a problem in those I've watched. It's just bad umpiring.Said this during the first bubble tour but non-neutral umpires are really not going to cut it.
Moeen Ali turned it a lot to bowl Kohli through the gate too. Too bad the English spinners aren’t good enough to do it as consistently as Ashwin does. Just like the Pakistani pacers weren’t good enough in England last summer. And the home team's batsmen knew how to handle the conditions better than the away team's batsmen, just like in this match.Jonathan Agnew is raging.
"You have got to be honest and say if this match was staged anywhere else in the world the ICC would be crawling all over it and Chennai would be taken off the hosting list. This is not a pitch Test cricket should be played on. It is a lottery. It is disappointing. It is not an advert for Test cricket."
"I am sure Axar Patel is a very nice chap. He looks a decent steady left-arm bowler. The fact he puts no revolutions on the ball and it is turning square probably tells you everything you need to know about this pitch.
We love Test cricket. There is no point playing it on pitches like this."
Until this test match I've not seen a problem in those I've watched. It's just bad umpiring.
The non-shot LBW is a poor decision made even worse by the fact that Joe Root isn't told/can't ask if the umpire considers a shot has been played.
How dare they try to take advantage of home conditions and put the English batsmen in a hard spot.Well this test has confirmed that India really didn't take kindly to being hammered in the first test. The pitch has been a shocker and the umpires have been village standard. If I didn't know any better I'd think they had been instructed to give us nothing.
No wonder they don't tend to lose series at home.
Agree with this. We revel in it when Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad tear through batting lineups on home soil.The subtext to these rants seems to be that whatever the English consider to be a good pitch has to be prepared wherever they go.
Again, i'd point out that a pitch that seams throughout the match and one that spins throughout the match, from the first to the last ball, are equally as hard to bat on in my view, as long as the bounce is not uneven. It’s just that the home team's batsmen have more skill. Kyle Jamieson was unplayable for our batsmen in New Zealand a couple months ago, but their batsmen looked comfortable on the same tracks.Agree with this. We revel in it when Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad tear through batting lineups on home soil.
I still don't think it's a good pitch when it's breaking up on day one. But also, Ebony Rainford-Brent on Channel 4 said: India have been better at batting and bowling, which is true.
I don't anything would be done even if this pitch was deemed to be terrible because it's an Indian pitch. But Aggers wouldn't start demanding Lord's should be sanctioned for producing a 2 1/2 days pitch. Although atmospheric conditions and weather play a bigger part in England and that can't be controlled.