Football Transfers Thread

[usy]

"Chelsea make ?600m bid for Supporters"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A37268184

Best article ever

duded64 added 1 Minutes and 25 Seconds later...

sneeze

lol.

 

[Cricketdude]

Ronaldinho going to Chelsea not AC Milan
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=738092

Ronaldo already confirmed deal with Real Madrid(according to Observer magazine)
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=737077

 

[PhilD123]

As reliable as sex with Tom Huddlestone.

 

[Cricketdude]

As reliable as sex with Tom Huddlestone.

Speaking from personal experience i see...?

 

[PhilD123]

Check the thread in general chat, about arsenal > spurs.

 

[Cricketdude]

Check the thread in general chat, about arsenal > spurs.

Dont have enough time now as i have to go to sleep as i have school tomorrow will do tomorrow.

 

[usy]

Dont have enough time now as i have to go to sleep as i have school tomorrow will do tomorrow.

but you have time to make a crap joke about frenches ;P?

 

[Will_NA]

Goal basically rip every headline from every major Italian or Spanish paper.

 

[m_vaughan]

Ronaldinho going to Chelsea not AC Milan
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=738092

Ronaldo already confirmed deal with Real Madrid(according to Observer magazine)
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=737077

Also mentioned on the same site.

Fergie to walk if Ronaldo is sold
http://www.goal.com/en/articolo.aspx?contenutoid=738793

Ronaldo not to return to Old Trafford
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=736385

United want Sneijder + Cash for Ronaldo, worst come worst
http://www.goal.com/en/Articolo.aspx?ContenutoId=736257

 

[PhilD123]

It's absolute nonsense.

 

[usy]

so goal.com = bullshit.com

 

[m_vaughan]

Well goal.com is actually good in the sense some of the news actually appears on their site before anywhere else. Their analysis and articles are some of the best and more correct you'll find. But their rumours are indeed based on all the newspapers, but the cite their sources, so the smart ones will know what to believe and what to not.

I think regarding the Ronaldo incident, only the Terra interview can be believed.

In the meantime Real Madrid have escaped any punishment from FIFA because United dont have any evidence to back their complaint. Nuts!

 

[Leicester Fox]

Terra is the least believeable source I've seen all summer. The bloke on sky sports trying to explain how he got the interview when the Portguese FA have said there wasn't one nor would there be one was a joke.

Everyone knew FIFA would never punish Madrid anyway, that might be of benefit to an English club, whatever next

 

[m_vaughan]

Regardless of what Sky says, Terra is highly reputed in Brazil. Even the BBC said that.

What did the Portuguese FA say?

 

[Leicester Fox]

Well Phil knows more about the Portuguese FA because I've only seen the interview with the man who supposedly interviewed Ronaldo, which isn't a matter of what sky think, it's a matter of a man looking telling a very unconvincing story, but apparently the FA said no interviews had taken place.