General Cricket Discussion

Broke my rule of not talking about hypothetical tournament structures after waking up at 5am and posting on reddit.

So, here it is. I can bookmark this so I don't have to ever post it again. In response to a post about promotion and relegation for the WTC.

One way to implement two divisions would be having a preliminary round at the start of each cycle with teams qualifying for divisions like the Super 6 in World Cups. This would mean the division you are in is only for the cycle and not pemanent or subject to promotion/relegation.

The other way would be just having two groups for 5/6/7 that are shuffled each cycle based on rankings or position in the last tournament.

The only other option, for me, would be replacing the WTC and having a multi-format World Championship that uses a points system for each series like the Women's Ashes. This would make almost all bilateral cricket matter. Series could have a minimum number of tests and wouldn't need to be even with the number of series wins ranking teams.
However, I just can't see teams risking losing their cash cow series and/or losing/sharing the income from them. What we have now is far from perfect (I'd rather England won the Ashes than the WTC) but the WTC is probably the best we can hope for given all the conflicting interests of individual boards.

I'm in favour of a shared income model, but, unless more money is found, the richer boards would lose out. How would they try and make up for that loss? More meaningless T20 bilateral series. I would like to see more done to support boards that are struggling, what England are doing with Zimbabwe might be a way forward, essentially giving them more money towards the tour.
 
This would normally be going straight to @Aislabie's Discord DMs, but this is so incredible I feel like I've got to share it here.

Tonight's BBL game was staffed by the following match officials:
1736163880549.png
So, the standing officials aren't of any note - you have Andrew Crozier, who knows what a wide is; Eloise Sheridan, who apparently doesn't; and Donovan Koch, whose first international game ended in a super over.

But the fourth umpire was former Sixers opener Riki Wessels, in his first involvement in a men's first-class-level match. And the match referee... was his dad, Kepler. I genuinely do not think that has ever happened before in a high-level game of cricket.

(Speaking of which, if Riki ever got his England cap, they'd have been the first family to represent three different nations also, I think)
 
ddrap14 said:
This would normally be going straight to @Aislabie's Discord DMs, but this is so incredible I feel like I've got to share it here.

Tonight's BBL game was staffed by the following match officials:
View attachment 301258
So, the standing officials aren't of any note - you have Andrew Crozier, who knows what a wide is; Eloise Sheridan, who apparently doesn't; and Donovan Koch, whose first international game ended in a super over.

But the fourth umpire was former Sixers opener Riki Wessels, in his first involvement in a men's first-class-level match. And the match referee... was his dad, Kepler. I genuinely do not think that has ever happened before in a high-level game of cricket.

(Speaking of which, if Riki ever got his England cap, they'd have been the first family to represent three different nations also, I think)
Click to expand...
Off the top of my head. Sammy Guillen played for New Zealand and the West Indies and his grandson (Logan van Beek) has represented Netherlands. Sammy also played for Trinidad & Tobago, which is it's own country, rather than the conglomerate of nations like the Windies. So, from a certain point of view, you could call that four.
 
wasteyouryouth said:
It more than ever makes me want to see one of them relegated. Although I'm sure they'd find a way to make that so it couldn't happen and if it did they'd scrap it. What's the point of having an exclusive club if one of the members can't be in it.
Click to expand...
1736194281409.png

This was the best I could come up with for a structure where the Big Three TM would still get to absolutely dominate the Test calendar, but where there would still be room for every Test nation to thrive and get time in the spotlight. I borrowed the idea of a tournament-based calendar from Rugby Union.

I've not bothered to put in the various minor trophies, because I can't quite be bothered figuring out which teams would fit where at which time.
 
Tier system is good once it is structured well.

Obviously this will benefit the Indian team the most.

I’m really sad and gutted that I was correct about India’s interests in the game over the years.

Forget teams in the top Tier! Only the Big 3 stands to benefit from a financial point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

aussie1st
  • Locked
New Cricket Chat Rules
Replies
0
Views
3K
aussie1st
aussie1st
N
  • Poll
Reliving Virat Kohli- The Captain
9 10 11
Replies
150
Views
21K
NILAYSHAH60
N
icyman
  • Poll
Future Indian Captains
2 3
Replies
40
Views
5K
asprin
asprin
Satan666
Underrated/Overrated Players
2
Replies
28
Views
4K
icyman
icyman
MattW
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Team Thread Index
Replies
0
Views
6K
MattW
MattW

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Total: 6 (members: 1, guests: 5)
    Top