Guybrush Threep
Club Captain
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2013
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Something about a prized wicket.
Then the commentary is just swearing.Turn the commentary off and do it yourself
The bad grammar bugs me the most. "Bushrangers is on fire in the field" and the like.
I honestly don't intend to be mean or anything but just for the sake of knowledge that is NOT a grammatical error, let alone a bad one.
Bushrangers, when used as a collective noun in both American as well as British English, invariably takes singular verb forms. It's like saying, a team of players is out on the field. That team is Bushrangers. Am I right?
@arjwiz I request you to also take note that the one you mentioned is technically NOT at all a grammatical error.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_noun
PS: Pardon me for playing the English language teacher here but I bet my English mentor is going to be proud.
The practice with sports teams is almost always to use a plural verb form - especially where like in this case the name is already plural. Discussion here, and the AP style guide also considers sports teams to be always plural, with occasional exceptions.honestly don't intend to be mean or anything but just for the sake of knowledge that is NOT a grammatical error, let alone a bad one.
Bushrangers, when used as a collective noun in both American as well as British English, invariably takes singular verb forms. It's like saying, a team of players is out on the field. That team is Bushrangers. Am I right?
The practice with sports teams is almost always to use a plural verb form - especially where like in this case the name is already plural. Discussion here, and the AP style guide also considers sports teams to be always plural, with occasional exceptions.
If it counts for anything, the Bushrangers use 'are' when describing themselves - such as in their Facebook bio.
I still maintain it is grammatically incorrect for a plural. Pretend it's not a sports team and just referring to normal people, "The bushranger is stealing" for one, and "The bushrangers are stealing" for many. It wouldn't be 'The bushrangers is stealing".Agreed. Though, my argument was purely in response to your comment about it being 'grammatically' incorrect.
I still maintain it is grammatically incorrect for a plural. Pretend it's not a sports team and just referring to normal people, "The bushranger is stealing" for one, and "The bushrangers are stealing" for many. It wouldn't be 'The bushrangers is stealing".
Just because they started playing cricket, they don't suddenly become a singular.