s2sschan
Club Cricketer
If they can't get Pakistan "A" out, how will they get the real Pakistan out???nightprowler10 said:Indian bowlers struggling to get Pakistan 'A' out.
Last edited by a moderator:
If they can't get Pakistan "A" out, how will they get the real Pakistan out???nightprowler10 said:Indian bowlers struggling to get Pakistan 'A' out.
Srinath was classed as Fast early in his career. He could consistantly clock speeds of over 150. Sreesanth is also pretty quick.s2sschan said:Munaf Patel or VRV Singh are suppossed to be the fastest. They haven't made it to the squad yet. Zaheer is the fastest in the squad.
India has not yet found a bowler who can be classified as "FAST" : . Srinath and Zaheer are classified as "Fast-Medium".
The search for the Holy Grail is still on. :
You forgot Murali. Sri Lanka also have Attapatu, Malinga, Dilshan and Jayawardene. All very good players.Jarryd said:Strong teams are England, South Africa, Pakistan, and to a lesser extent India. Windies are slowly rebuilding and are weak at the moment. Sri Lanka have two good players, Vass and the Chucker. New Zealand have good players, but have absolutely shocking depth. Zimbabwe and Bangladesh speak for themselves.
ZoraxDoom said:Why do people hate Agarkar? Give me one solid reason!
He can't take wickets - Wrong! As it stands, whenever Dravid/Ganguly need/needed a breakthrough, they have and will turn to Agarkar.
ZoraxDoom said:He is too expensive- Wrong! He isn't more expensive than the rest of our pace attack. If anything, he probably has the ability to tie up an end better than any of our other seamers.
ZoraxDoom said:To top it off, he can bat, is a very good fielder, and has lots of experience. He can swing the new ball and reverse the old one. He also has been a lot more consistent in the last few months.
Any other reasons?
s2sschan said:56 Wickets in 25 Tests. Yeah Right! SO remarkable. :
Goes for over 5 runs per over in ODI's, Econ Rate is 5.10. India need at least two fast Strike bowlers in Tests. Only then we can use a support bowler to tie up ends.
Can bat??? 7 Ducks in a row against Australia.
Lot of players can swing and reverse swing the ball. That dosen't make one an International bowler.
Agarakar would not have made it to any other team besides India, Zimbabwe, and Bangladesh.
Agarkar is in because, non-cricketing issues have sidelined Zaheer and Balaji.
I don't hate him, just believe that he shouldn't be in the playing XI.
Enjoying the debate with you Zorax, don't take anything personally.
Stats don't tell the whole story. If you've watched him play in tests, you would see that he has a knack of getting crucial wickets. Even recently against Sri Lanka - who got the dangerous inform Sangakkarra out? him. Wo got rid of Jayawardene when he was motoring along beautifully? Him.56 Wickets in 25 Tests. Yeah Right! SO remarkable.
All our pacers go for over 5 in ODIs. He has the best strike rate and was the fastest bowler to ever reach 50 ODI wickets.Goes for over 5 runs per over in ODI's, Econ Rate is 5.10. India need at least two fast Strike bowlers in Tests. Only then we can use a support bowler to tie up ends.
And a 100 at Lords. Dhoni, Yuvraj, Kaif, Pathan, and Laxman(I think) can't say they have done that. He also got close to scoring 50s twice recently against Sri lanka.Can bat??? 7 Ducks in a row against Australia.
But none of our current seamers can do it. So he is an assest.Lot of players can swing and reverse swing the ball. That dosen't make one an International bowler.
Riiggghhtt...because no team wants the bowler who was the fastest to reach 50 ODI wickets in the history of the game. Nor do they want the bowler who got a hundred at lords, or who has been India's top wicketaker recently. He would make Pakistan(replacing Sami), West Indies, South Africa(Instead of Kruger), and maybe even England in ODIs. But its no poin arguing if he would make another country. If he was in England he might have been a batsman..Agarakar would not have made it to any other team besides India, Zimbabwe, and Bangladesh.
Yup, those include Fitness, Work Ethics, Behaviour and Form. He beats those two in all these aspects.Agarkar is in because, non-cricketing issues have sidelined Zaheer and Balaji.
Fine, but he should if we are carrying three seamers.I don't hate him, just believe that he shouldn't be in the playing XI.
Non takenEnjoying the debate with you Zorax, don't take anything personally.
scorpion_rulezz said:Farhat Makes A ComeBack
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/cricket/4592216.stm
Pakistan squad: Inzamam-ul-Haq (capt), Salman Butt, Imran Farhat, Mohammad Yousuf, Younis Khan, Shahid Afridi, Abdul Razzaq, Kamran Akmal Shoaib Malik, Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Sami, Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, Mohammad Asif, Danish Kaneria, Arshad Khan
Strong squad though,tough decisions to be made...
My Team
Imran Farhat
Salman Butt
Younis Khan
Mohammad Yousuf
Inzamam-ul-Haq
Shahid Afridi
Abdul Razzaq
Kamran Akmal
Shoaib Akhtar
Mohammad Sami/Rana Naved-ul-Hasan
Danish Kaneria
Hey man plz dont compare Agarkar with Afridi..... Its just terrible for meIf Ian Austin,Mark Ealham,Shahid Afridi,Nicky Boje are allrounders then Agarkar is as well
Old news now. I'm glad they cut it down. IIRC, the two teams played against each other in 15 ODIs and 6 tests(?) between April 2004 and April 2005. That is a bit much.ZexyZahid said:Maybe good or bad news for some people.
Pakistan and India to cut matches
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/4592072.stm