He's not comparing. he is just saying, if you could call them allrounders, then you can very well call Agarkar one.PakiFan said:Hey man plz dont compare Agarkar with Afridi..... Its just terrible for me
He's not comparing. he is just saying, if you could call them allrounders, then you can very well call Agarkar one.PakiFan said:Hey man plz dont compare Agarkar with Afridi..... Its just terrible for me
Lolz...Sir, actually you're making me laugh! Afridi is an-rounder? lolz.. talk about his batting average and that makes me laugh as well. To me he's in Pakistani side as a bowler more than a batsman. If you can take a look at his batting average is around 25 in ODI as same as Pathan has and even better. He's just a slugger like Balaji and nothing else.Hariz said:Oh please dont make me laugh, Agarkar does not have enough quality to be compared to Afridi. His title of a all-rounder is not justified, to me he is a medium fast bowler with not a very handsome average. Thats all.
Dhoni said:Lolz...Sir, actually you're making me laugh! Afridi is an-rounder? lolz.. talk about his batting average and that makes me laugh as well. To me he's in Pakistani side as a bowler more than a batsman. If you can take a look at his batting average is around 25 in ODI as same as Pathan has and even better. He's just a slugger like Balaji and nothing else.
Anyway, my Lineup for India.
Maybe you laugh too much and for no reason.Dhoni said:Lolz...Sir, actually you're making me laugh! Afridi is an-rounder? lolz.. talk about his batting average and that makes me laugh as well. To me he's in Pakistani side as a bowler more than a batsman. If you can take a look at his batting average is around 25 in ODI as same as Pathan has and even better. He's just a slugger like Balaji and nothing else.
Hariz said:Dhoni mate, I called him an all-rounder not an-rounder. Secondly look for yourself in the stats, Afridi has an average of 25 in ODIs with 3 100s and 7 50s and has taken 179 wickets in ODIs, although he not always gets to bowl all of his alloted overs and ends up just increasing pakistan's over rate most of the times. He has got better stats than that in tests. Not to mentions his recent form in both Tests and Odis.
Agarkar (so called all-rounder) averages 16 in both formes of the game and has around 50 more wickets, even though he usually opens the bowling and gets to use his 10 overs. Have a look yourelf:
Shahid Afridi
Ajit Agarkar
IIRC, he made it into the team as a leggie. Never even considered himself a batsman before that century.ZexyZahid said:Afridi came in the ODI scene because of his batting. He hit the quickest century in the history in his 2nd ODI. He developed his bowling later on. Now he is very good player with batting and bowling.
He is averaging more than 100 runs in Ranji competition. He looks is really good form. I have nothing against Gambhir, and think that he too is a good batsman. But, considering the form Jaffer is right now it would be a huge mistake to leave him out of the starting XI.ZexyZahid said:I recently found out that Jaffer made once 400 not out for school cricket.