puddleduck
Chairman of Selectors
hindustani said:still hes not a full time bowler
I guess you know best. Afterall a full time bowler could never take 434 test wickets at just under 30 and 253 ODI wickets.
hindustani said:still hes not a full time bowler
hindustani said:i cant understand y india cant take their test victories to odis
hindustani said:still hes (kapil dev)not a full time bowler
hindustani said:still hes not a full time bowler
hindustani said:and hey guess what dhoni is scared of the ball. and theres a new rule in cricket. dont catch
the ball.
hindustani said:i cant understand y india cant take their test victories to odis
aditya123 said:Quite a lot of crap posted in the last 2 pages about Kapil Dev not being a full-time bowler .
A great win today.
Must now look to carry on and win the series .
Must not throw it away like we did after the Adelaide test in 2003.
Dec 16th, 2003 -- India bt Australia by 6 wickets at Adelaide
Dec 18th, 2006 -- India bt SA by 123 runs at Jo`burg
I would like to ask all Indian supporters, which one means more to you ?
I feel both are very similar because we were expected to lose 4-0 then and we were expected to lose 3-0 before this series started.
exactly.saisrini80 said:and from now on, no worries for the next 8 ODI's. all are in india and that too against west indies and sri lanka. who knows? we might even crush them!
cricket_lover said:wohoo, India won!
Now, most of us predicted a 3-0 whitewash, and look what has happened!
Interesting, Three teams set their opponents a target of 400 plus, and all those three teams won.
Fantastic effort from India, contributions from almost everyone, and you can't have a better place than to win in SA, for the first time!