India in South Africa

Skater

ICC Chairman
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Profile Flag
England
It was a good performance from India in their first ever Twenty20 match. However, if Shaun Pollock, Makhaya Ntini, Andre Nel, Andrew Hall, Mark Boucher and so on been playing it may have been a different result. Still, I can't take anything away from them, it was a good performance.
 

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
DDK!!! Fantastic!!
Now, why is he not a regular in the squad, pray tell? Better keeper, younger, a more talented and technically adept batter, and can hit sixes.

skateboarder said:
It was a good performance from India in their first ever Twenty20 match. However, if Shaun Pollock, Makhaya Ntini, Andre Nel, Andrew Hall, Mark Boucher and so on been playing it may have been a different result. Still, I can't take anything away from them, it was a good performance.
Spoilsport :( That has single handedly make me remember how muvh India suck :(
 

sohum

Executive member
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Location
San Francisco, CA
Profile Flag
India
Good job from KKD; the warning bells should be ringing in Dhoni's head.

skateboarder said:
It was a good performance from India in their first ever Twenty20 match. However, if Shaun Pollock, Makhaya Ntini, Andre Nel, Andrew Hall, Mark Boucher and so on been playing it may have been a different result. Still, I can't take anything away from them, it was a good performance.
To that end, we were missing Yuvraj and Dravid from our batting line-up and also Agarkar got injured half-way. No doubt the South African team wasn't their best team, but they did select a lot of guys who could bat and bowl (Henderson, Telemachus, for example).
 

Gibbsrules

Club Cricketer
Joined
Jan 1, 2005
Location
Durban
Online Cricket Games Owned
Well done India,looks like some players are finding form,will have to see in the last ODI.As for us,what Smith was thinking by bringing in peterson so late,I don't know.He should have been bowling much earlier.oh well,still the last ODI to look forward to.I would like to see some of the other players be given a chance,such as Morkel and Prince.Also would have been good to see Botha make his return in this match,but wasn't to be.
 

irottev

School Cricketer
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Location
England
Online Cricket Games Owned
Not a very high scoring game. Probably not worth watching :(

India did pretty well though. I don't think 120 is going to be defended in a Twenty20 often if at all.
 

prarara

International Cricketer
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Location
MN, US
Online Cricket Games Owned
oh I found this interesting:

And now here's a quiz question - name one Indian batsman who has handled Pollock with conviction over the last five years. If you came up with the name Sourav Ganguly, you've hit Bulls Eye - Ganguly, in the 114 balls he's faced from Pollock, has scored 90 runs and been dismissed just twice, for an average of 45. During the debacle at Port Elizabeth, the commentators were harping on the fact that India didn't have a single left-hander in their top order (Dinesh Mongia and Suresh Raina weren't in the playing XI). Would the presence of Ganguly have helped?

Cricinfo
 

kuttakumar

International Coach
Joined
Nov 14, 2004
Location
Kolkata,India
Online Cricket Games Owned
ZoraxDoom said:
DDK!!! Fantastic!!
Now, why is he not a regular in the squad, pray tell? Better keeper, younger, a more talented and technically adept batter, and can hit sixes.

I will second that view.He must at least get a chance to keep wickets in Test matches.
 

s2sschan

Club Cricketer
Joined
Jan 1, 2005
Location
Long Island, New Yor
Online Cricket Games Owned
ZoraxDoom said:
DDK!!! Fantastic!!
Now, why is he not a regular in the squad, pray tell? Better keeper, younger, a more talented and technically adept batter, and can hit sixes.

So you want to diss Dhoni already?
 

SaiSrini

Respected Legend
CSK
PlanetCricket Award Winner
Joined
Apr 26, 2003
Location
USA
ZoraxDoom said:
105 with 9 wickets in 93 balls needed. Viru and....Mongia?? I know he can hit hard, but you have Dhoni? Why settle for Diet Coke when you've got the original sitting right there?
10
103 in 90

He he.. what a logic??

Anyways, Mongia played very well yesterday. That 38 off 45 balls was really good in the context of the game! Dinesh Karthick was brilliant for his 31. Looks like he can settle in the team as a specialist batsman. He is a very good fielder and a livewire on the field (from what we have seen in this tour). And with him in the team, Dhoni will always feel the heat!

I think India can take some confidence of this win into the last match. I am expecting a much improved performance from the Indian batsmen in the last match. Also since the team for the tests is announced, the team I feel is going to be on their toes. and Laxman's presence is going to help since he is a senior with lots of experience! Hope India finally wins a ODI match this series! Anyways, waiting for the test matches!
 
Last edited:

ZoraxDoom

Respected Legend
Joined
Nov 28, 2004
Location
Hong Kong
Online Cricket Games Owned
s2sschan said:
So you want to diss Dhoni already?
I don't know where you've been dude, but I've ALWAYS been dissing Dhoni. I feel Karthik is a better keeper and batsman. Dhoni is fine if all you want is a hard hitter. But if you are gonna play him above 7, what's the point? he gets out if he is bogged down. Let him go wild at 3, or hold him at 7, or play Karthik.
Oh, and in tests, it should be a no brainer. Like how Ramdi gets selected over Baugh, or Sangakkarra used to over Kalu, Karthik should be over Dhoni. Simple as that.
 

Cricketman

ICC Chairman
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Location
USA
I think Dhoni is a good enough batsman so that he can still stay in the side even if he doesn't keep.
Dinesh Kaarthick is BY FAR a better wicket keeper than Dhoni, and is turning out to be a better batsman too.
He's shown that he can hit the big 'uns too, that he can aggress in pressure situations and succeed.
I can't see why there isn't space for both of them in the ODI side, tests, Dhoni i gotta say, we don't need him.

andrew_nixon said:
Several of you need to read this: http://www.planetcricket.org/forums/showthread.php?t=26496

I've just had to delete more than a dozen posts. I don't expect to have to delete more.

Sorry AN...won't happen again :D

VVS Laxman announced as Vice Captain for the Tests :) I'm sooo happy for him. Just in time for a last hurrah in the world cup, i pray that he will do well.
Theres a high chance that he'll also captain the first match, as Dravid struggles with his injury.
Ganguly, he is MY HERO. He let the world know that we are not push overs who rely on the one man, Sachin Tendulkar. He made it so that people wouldn't turn off their TV's just because ST got out. He told the world in his awesome in-your-face attitude that we can too, challenge the best of the best. And he's doing it again. in a time of trouble, when the whole world was against him, he has pulled it off. He is back in the side, slamming a ranji century.
COMING SOON: Ganguly Sig,
Sai, bring back the Ganguly Fanclub? and in its new correspondence with the newly revived Indian Team Fanclub?
 

aussie1st

Retired Administrator
Joined
Dec 16, 2003
Location
Auckland
Dhoni you definitely need in the ODIs as hes such a good striker of the ball as his SR in ODI cricket shows. Also his average is up there with the best ODI players so at worst play him as a batter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top