LiveLoveABD
ICC Board Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2013
- Location
- Kolkata, India.
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
Now that seemed a bit unnecessary. There are other ways to convey your disappointment rather than calling players by names. Only thing I could say is that he has struggled against the moving ball and doesn't have enough calibre to survive in those conditions but still have enough of potential to punch above his weight to survive in those conditions. Just requires a bit of mental discipline. He has developed himself a lot more than what he had a couple of years ago.
You need to stop taking things personally when it comes to Rohit Sharma. These kind of analogies are common in forums. Seen AB de Villiers run between the wickets in the first 10 minutes of his innings? Ants in pants, cat on a hot tin roof type situation. He's quick but he's edgy and nervous and makes some disastrous judgement calls. Just because I'm a manic fan of his doesn't mean I'll take everything said about him personally or say things about him with a coat of sugar. Facts are facts. And I don't know what development or punch above the weight stuff you're talking about. Rohit is what? 31? 32? I think I rather see someone like Shubman Gill fail for 2-3 years than hope Rohit comes off age and gives Indian cricket 2-3 more good years. It's basic ROI. Not saying Rohit Sharma can't do it, but for Indian cricket I think that ship has sailed.
Another thing- All batsmen struggle against the moving ball. I have seen a lot of posts on this forum about Rohit Sharma's technique and I think he has a better one than Virat Kohli. He is more still throughout, he has basically a very tiny back and across followed by a forward press so he is always going to be vulnerable against a fast in swinger but it enables him to not only pull off the front foot but also very good on anything that's slightly overpitched. His problem is in the head. He has absolutely no patience and the reason it doesn't harm him in LOI is because there aren't enough attacking fielders. His failure in tests has nothing to do with technique, only to do with mental fortitude. If he had the resolve of Dravid/Pujara, he would have been the second Bradman.