So far the ICl claims to have poached Inzamam U-Haq, Shane Ware, Glenn McGrath and Stephen Flemming.
To be honest, I dont think Warnie will want to take part in a tournament in India as he can't stand the place, because of the food issue. Remember the infamous Baked Bean fly-over rescue!
Warne's Manager
"Certainly I am p**sed off, and I think Shane is rightly p**sed off, that they said he had announced he had signed," Erskine said in the Herald Sun. "That's not true. That hasn't gone down well. That shows a lack of organising."
Stuart Law, the former Australian one-day batsman, is one of the names doing the rounds as a prospective ICL player. He isn't very well-known in India but has strong Twenty20 credentials. Law, who now plays for Lancashire, told Cricinfo he wasn't aware of being on the ICL scouts' list but is willing to join the league, if made an offer, since he is not affiliated with any country. "My contract with Lancashire is up at the end of this season and it [ICL] might be something that fits really well with me," Law said. "It is appealing to me because I haven't played enough international cricket at that level and it's a chance for me to test my skills in foreign conditions."
Warns youngsters that they may not be selected for India if they sign up
Pawar scoffs at Indian Cricket League
August 2, 2007
Sharad Pawar, the Indian board (BCCI) president, ridiculed an unofficial Indian Cricket League (ICL) competition carrying a prize of US$1 million, saying it would mainly feature players coming out of retirement. Pawar also warned that promising young players would be ineligible for the Indian team if they played in the tournament, which is being bankrolled by Zee Telefilms, India's largest listed media company.
"I can't see any threat from the ICL," Pawar said. "Not many people are interested in watching retired players in action. Everyone wants to see official cricket, not the oldies. I see no reason for young players going there. Only those who play official cricket can represent India."
Well you had that proof below your post, but why on Earth should the Cricket Boards not be the sole right holders of international cricket in their country? Anyone could organize cricket then and completely undermine the official ICC approved systems going on.Sharad Pawar should stick to politics and leave cricket alone. By preventing more healthy competition he wants to ensure that BCCI gets all the big bucks... I'm afraid the BCCI will armtwist every current player/future prospect into ignoring the ICL.
I'm curious. In what way does BCCI legally hold monopoly over Indian Cricket? What is the legal basis for the BCCI being the only controller of cricket in India?
And no... I'm not talking about your opinions. I want solid, legal proof of this, not another person telling me that the BCCI is the official board of Indian cricket which everybody knows.