Pathirana will play, I'm saying he needs an able backup . Cant be the only pacer in the entire squadIt’s extremely unlikely we’ll abandon Pathirana unless he plays as badly as he does with Sri Lanka for us. There’s no domestic player that can do what he does where as we’ve got other domestic options that can do a poor man’s job of those overseas players.
I’m bemused as to why you continually ignore the best pacer in Matt Henry from your list in these discussions , he’s a class apart from every suggestion you’ve made there other than Taskin who won’t be available thanks to the BCB anyways.
Can't believe they scheduled this while an India match is going on
Pathirana will play, I'm saying he needs an able backup . Cant be the only pacer in the entire squad
I never thought of Henry as much as a T20 bowler, I'd love to be proven wrong, maybe he can get a CSK homecoming
Pathirana will play, I'm saying he needs an able backup . Cant be the only pacer in the entire squad
I never thought of Henry as much as a T20 bowler, I'd love to be proven wrong, maybe he can get a CSK homecoming
That's called overgeneralisationYou never need to ask psychology students what they are studying they will tell themselves.
I have only met one Psychology student and how did I know he is one because he posted it on a cricket forum. Yes I will overgenaralise what will you do pscho analyze me?That's called overgeneralisation
How I imagine the look on your face writing thisI have only met one Psychology student and how did I know he is one because he posted it on a cricket forum. Yes I will overgenaralise what will you do pscho analyze me?
Nah you can't afford my psychoanalysisI have only met one Psychology student and how did I know he is one because he posted it on a cricket forum. Yes I will overgenaralise what will you do pscho analyze me?
Ssshh ...First Pandya and now him, totally unfair.
View attachment 288268
LMAO xD
It is a suspense.