stefan
International Coach
Why is BCCI not using DRS such a big deal? Especially in light of DRS having gotten into so many blunders off late. You assume that the Bailey one would hvae been given out 100% on review. But that is not always the case. The very recent Lyon decision is a perfect example, similar to Bailey's -
Anyone who sees this will tell you Lyon was out, there is a clear mark on Hot Spot, and yet, Lyon was given n.o. Even Steven Smith described it as a 'pretty big error'.
Nothing on snicko, nothing on hot spot, and yet the caught behind out decision is upheld. I bet Root thought, its okay I didn't edge it and I have DRS it will be sorted out soon. DRS messes up then.
Why do you assume that for Bailey he would definitely have been given out on review. How do you know the DRS system would not have messed it up too like it did for Lyon, and Bailey would have remained not out.
Reviews are all well and good but DRS is clearly still a work in progress. In light of sudden influx in DRS errors ICC have infact commissioned another study into DRS to be done by MIT. Why not wait for the flaws to be ironed out.
Won't comment on the root one as I didn't follow it. The lyon one is an umpiring mistake has nothing to do with drs, you can have a flawless system nigel long gets it wrong it will still be wrong. Yes there were 2 decision drs got wrong but there are many more that it gets right.
Easily because there are more flaws with normal umpires then with drs. Also I believe the MIT study from the ICC is to convince the BCCI to accept drs, the ICC would like it standardized.