for your kind information i have not ripped anybody's work i searched it as bg believe me or else i will show you from the next works investigate if you want i have not ripped
The only thing I see 'ripped' from both works is the overlayed dots in the bottom right corner. Other than that it seems to be original.
I don't think using a texture in a similiar place as someone else has done it counts as 'ripping'. It just borders plagirism.
EDIT: Well, when you look at it closer. It's as if he has copied some areas from your signature and used them in a different way on his. But it's still not classed as 'ripping' since that means to completely copy a graphic pixel for pixel.
If you look carefully all corners except the top right one are copied. The texure over Charlotte in the bottom left is used by him in bottom right.
He has actually used my background and just removed the render and the surrounding area. In no means he could have manged to produce the exactly same result unless it isn't ripped.
Edit : I've checked it from the staff members of a solely dedicated graphics forum and they say it is a rip.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.