Murali the best?

Muralitharan better than Warne?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 20.0%
  • No

    Votes: 24 68.6%
  • Maby

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 3 8.6%

  • Total voters
    35
Ok lets look at it like this. IF (a big IF) they were both as good bowlers, i would pick Warne because he can bat and Murali well can't. Warne averages 30+ against WIndies too. Warne > Murali.
 
Anyone who knows anything about cricket knows leg spinners bowl better on bouncing wickets.....

It?s laughable that people don't know this. Do you guys watch cricket or hear about it somewhere??

Remember the time Warne got massacred in the hand of Tendulkar in India? That was fun to watch...
 
Tendulkar and Lara smack about Muralitharan more than they do to Warne. End case. Two best batsmen unfair Muralitharan more. Ave of 86 and 80 against Sri Lanka. And Lara scored 600 runs vs Muralitharan. Keep quiet now.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top