My own Processor benchmark Tool -

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Uhh, which values exactly? I must've forgotten...

 

[Abhas]

THe text part where it shows us the seconds..

 

[MacWorld]

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.4GHz)

Test- 1000000000

Thread 1= 12.303
Thread 2= 6.391

 

[Maxkarter]

AMD Athlon x64 5200+

1000000000 Test

1 Thread - 9.958 seconds.
2 Threads - 5.424 seconds.

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Cheers for the results, both of you.

From the current looks of it, I have to make the test a bit more stressing to make sure a good processor comes out as a good one. Atm the Q6600 has worse timing than the X2 5200, probably due to the clockspeed difference.

 

[Harrypotter_fan]

Thats what I meant by simultaneous, dividing the workload.

 

[Neo95]

Finished! Total time taken was 193.901 seconds.

 

[Abhas]

Which processor do you have??
The timings aren't the best

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Finished! Total time taken was 193.901 seconds.

Which test did you choose?

 

[Amiya]

Intel Core 2 Duo
E4400 @ 2.00GHz
1.99 GHz, 504 MB RAM

TEST

♣1000000000

1 Thread - 14.909 seconds.
2 Thread - 7.532 seconds.


♣ 5000000000

1 Thread – 74.61 seconds.
2 Thread – 37.41 seconds.

 

[Neo95]

Which test did you choose?

5000000000 2 threads
Intel Pentium D 2.8 Ghz

 

[MacWorld]

5000000000 2 threads
Intel Pentium D 2.8 Ghz

thats why^

But it shouldnt be that bad, right?

 

[Abhas]

he tested using 5000000000 test. That's why he got 193 seconds.

 

[Amiya]

Intel Core 2 Duo
E4400 @ 2.00GHz
1.99 GHz, 504 MB RAM

TEST

♣1000000000

1 Thread - 14.909 seconds.
2 Thread - 7.532 seconds.


♣ 5000000000

1 Thread – 74.61 seconds.
2 Thread – 37.41 seconds.

Is my pc performence good or it should be better?

 

[Kshitiz_Indian]

Its good enough, they're actually better than my score, I wonder how!!!

I'll try finding the roots of such anomalies... probably will go in for a console based version next time to minimise the cpu usage.