Atharv
Club Cricketer
My argument against Kohli being the new Number three is that he is too flashy for that position, and I don't believe he has that determination to play out time when the team has lost a very early wicket and the new ball bowlers are steaming in and are giving hell to the batsman. Pujara is of the Dravid kind who can come in, eat up balls and bide out the testing period and then slowly start flourishing. Or even Rahane who has batted at No.3 many times for Mumbai in domestic cricket.
Kohli is a perfect No.4! Once Sachin retires, No.4 must be Kohli's spot. But right now, having Pujara at No.6 is also not a bad option. His recent 96* for India-A vs WI-A where he batted with the tail and took India home to victory reminded of the way VVS used to win games for India batting with the tail. Pujara has that kind of talent too.
Another Dravid at number 3 ? Nope .
Flashy is the wrong word . Attacking is the correct word . Like Ricky Ponting . I am not a big fan of players who just eat up deliveries without rotating strike/scoring. Kohli can buckle down when the need arises . He is not an impulsive stroke maker like Sehwag .