pal
International Coach
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2004
- Online Cricket Games Owned
Pakistan is just amazing man, if they didn't have those akthar troubles and were stable during the series against Aus, they could have put up a stiff fight..
That said, I didn't expect India to just crumble like this, saisrini80, I am with you now man, dada is required, whatever you say about his playing skills, he has the ability to inspire the team to win.. Also he wouldn't make dumbass decisions like dropping kartik (best bowler in the last few matches) on a pitch where the spinners made merry, bhajji was the best bowler for india in the game, arshad khan took 3/33 in 10 overs.. secondly no sane person would drop balaji for either nehra or agarkar, especially ajit, because he hasn't played in a while and if you introduce him for the last deciding match, how do you expect him to perform?
Those of you who answer me that agarkar took 3 wickets, so he actually did well, or nehra took 3 wickets, so he did well, look at where they got their wickets, agarkar got all his wickets when pakistan were almost at 300 and were going for the slogging, it's like someone bowling bad during the entire game and then during the last few overs getting some wickets when the batsman is going for the big shots, that's not good bowling and the same applies for Nehra, he got 2 of his wickets at the end and in the beginning and middle, got thrashed...
That said, I didn't expect India to just crumble like this, saisrini80, I am with you now man, dada is required, whatever you say about his playing skills, he has the ability to inspire the team to win.. Also he wouldn't make dumbass decisions like dropping kartik (best bowler in the last few matches) on a pitch where the spinners made merry, bhajji was the best bowler for india in the game, arshad khan took 3/33 in 10 overs.. secondly no sane person would drop balaji for either nehra or agarkar, especially ajit, because he hasn't played in a while and if you introduce him for the last deciding match, how do you expect him to perform?
Those of you who answer me that agarkar took 3 wickets, so he actually did well, or nehra took 3 wickets, so he did well, look at where they got their wickets, agarkar got all his wickets when pakistan were almost at 300 and were going for the slogging, it's like someone bowling bad during the entire game and then during the last few overs getting some wickets when the batsman is going for the big shots, that's not good bowling and the same applies for Nehra, he got 2 of his wickets at the end and in the beginning and middle, got thrashed...