LiveLoveABD
ICC Board Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2013
- Location
- Kolkata, India.
- Profile Flag
- India
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - PS3
Cannot agree with this at all. Amla averages over 50 in ODI's, with a strike rate of close to 90. He has 27 centuries in just 167 innings. Conversion rate is also outstanding with 36 fifties. I'm not sure what on earth you're talking about with the "vastly overrated" claim. Care to elaborate? Doesn't really make any sense to me. Any team, and I mean any team, will take De Kock as their wicket keeper with their eyes closed. Not even close as a contest right now. Bairstow might be the only exception there. Du Plesis is a great captain and batsman. Once again, I'm not sure what you mean. Tahir's numbers are a bit down in the last two years but are by no means average. Still talking more wickets than innings played.
Stats and mini skirts are the same. They never reveal the full picture. Amla is a solid bat. Deserving of his spot as well as de Kock. But, are they world beaters? No. England have a whole host of batters in that mould and India have 2-3. NZ have Williamson and the Aussies have Warner. This SA batting has batted around AB in the last decade or so and that's why they've looked good. The stats can go and twerk off for all I care. The reason Amla is not a match winner per se in limited overs is because he batted 50 overs and still couldn't destroy the opposition. Put Rohit Sharma there and he will probably make a double or a daddy hundred.