EarlCG
Club Cricketer
Good - I take that as a rule in any future games we play against each other.I think the short cover is possibly a good idea, nothing wrong with point though imo.
Agreed - I'm afraid my complete inability to be concise has exacerbated that. (Translation: I write too muchThis has been blown out of proportion a little methinks
![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/wink.gif)
That's nothing to do with me as far as I'm concerned. Clearly there's no grounds to blacklist you for using a dubious tactic in a few overs of one game, when there was no agreement prior to the game that this was frowned upon (it never having arisen before). Blacklists should purely be for those repeat offenders of widely agreed or blatantly obvious rules.I found myself labelled a wide line player or something, and tagged on the 'unfair' list.![]()
Unfortunately Angrypixel seems to be getting way over excited as seems to be his tendency. He started his creed post even before he'd receive the game and, as a result, the majority of his creed is nonsense IMO. Yorkers simply aren't a problem and he's not limiting fields correctly to counter wideline (minimum of two fielders on the legside for me - instead he's come up with this 2 & 3 stuff - where are the other four?).
I'm sorry :'( Hopefully remembering skittiling me from 44-3 and Tim Ambrose biffing me around will cheer you upI cried a little inside this morning Earl.
![Wink ;) ;)](/forums/styles/planetcricket/xenforo/smilies/wink.gif)
Last edited: