Which is exactly why I added in that post that the animations aren't even that bad to warrant such type of a "u-turn" or whatever.
Kshitiz_Indian added 10 Minutes and 33 Seconds later...
Just read the CricketGaming Q and A. Assuming its authentic, a few things about the PC requirements come up.
He says that with a 4850 he can go upto 1280x720, but it "doesn't hurt" to go 1920x1080. I really hope that he just meant that he could go on a 4850 to 1080p but didn't, because if its otherwise [That a 4850 cannot handle it at 1080p], then sorry folks, but this is lazy programming upto its limits.
Seeing the graphics in the videos, even if the game is not very well optimised[Like say, COD4], I'd expect a AMD 3870/9600GT to be easily capable of running it at 1440x900 on the highest quality and with quite a lot of AA, though even saying 1680x1050 wouldn't exactly be wrong, because the game does seem like that.
He said an 8800GTX was "enough". What the bloody hell does that mean?
I mean, yes its 2 generations older now, but it still packs quite a punch, enough to run it very well!
At the beginning of the question he claimed that something along the lines of the power of a console GPU. From so many years of experience with GPU chips, I can safely say that the 3870 is far more powerful than the GPU inside the Xbox360 / PS3. Can Heath / someone else from transmission here confirm / dismiss my doubt?