By suggesting it was something Bangladesh should have reviewed, which implies teams need to have a review in hand to get a height no ball checked when that's not necessary for front foot ones. A basic umpiring mistake should be resolved without the need for teams to use up reviews.
No I am not implying that BD (or anyone) should have/need to refer for review on waist high no balls. I already said that the decision should have been made after a look the replays and not before it. However even with this error BD could have had the chance to get him had they left themselves with a review.
I don't care who the match was against - wrong umpiring decisions are wrong umpiring decisions. We have abundant technology to be able to make these decisions correctly - I want them to use it and for the third umpire to be empowered to reverse on field decisions without being called upon.
This is my biggest problem with DRS in its present form, and this is what drives me mad when a DRS review error is made. We clearly have the tech !! Why can the ICC not just clear up the grey areas that still exist. In fact why should there still be grey areas, we have had DRS for years now. Just take the time, define everyone's roles, clearly set the rules for interpretation and standardise everything, tweak a few things that need to be tweaked and we are good to go. Sadly ICC just doesn't seem to care.
I think Bangladesh would have lost regardless, but it was so easy to correct this umpiring mistake that I think they are right to complain about it. Stupidity for anyone to suggest there was fixing involved, which just distracts from the legitimacy of the complaint about umpires not double checking a crucial call.
Its really not about whether BD would have lost or not. They probably would have but who knows. The point however remains, that the Umpires made a mistake, but even so it could have been corrected had BD got a review left. What I do have a problem with the light in which the initial comment was made that started this those discussion, which kind of tried to show it in the light of - oh there go India and BCCI again benefiting from a poor decision as they do 90% of the times, or whatever that made up stat was. That was just an insensible thing to say.