Yeah Bollinger has done the job certainly numbers wise. But it seems like he's bowling a bit worse than the numbers suggest IMHO. But as I said, I find it quite hard to analyse Dougie. He's an enigma. But I like him more than Siddle at this point.
The Lee I'm thinking of was the Lee that turned up in the tour match on the Ashes tour where he bowled fast reverse swinging yorkers to skittle the Lions. The underweight, sick Lee in India not so much. And Hilfy at least can be tidy even if he's not ripping the wickets out. I think Hilf & Hauritz for tidyness + Mitch and Lee/Siddle/Bollinger for wickets would be a decent-good attack. I just like Lee because he can do more with the new and old ball which is where there can be obvious improvement in the Australian attack right now.
The Lee I'm thinking of was the Lee that turned up in the tour match on the Ashes tour where he bowled fast reverse swinging yorkers to skittle the Lions. The underweight, sick Lee in India not so much. And Hilfy at least can be tidy even if he's not ripping the wickets out. I think Hilf & Hauritz for tidyness + Mitch and Lee/Siddle/Bollinger for wickets would be a decent-good attack. I just like Lee because he can do more with the new and old ball which is where there can be obvious improvement in the Australian attack right now.