South Africa in England July-Sept 2012

At the ground awesome morning. Everyone in the ground was expecting a not out for the Kallis decision, proper odd decision even though I didn't have the best view of the video screen.

What is it with Lords and champers? Everyone has a bottle and it's going everywhere. Some poor sod along the line from me just got covered as it sprayed from some one mans bottle like he was celebrating an F1 win. Poor blokes soaked to his skin haha
 
I had an awesome day. I never quite realised how gentrified the Lords crowd would be. Literally Champagne everywhere I was surrounded by doctors the stuff was going everywhere.

Sat there watching two elderly men having a "picnic". They had salmonds, prawns, strawberries all washed down with two bottles of wine.

It's alright but I much prefer Trent Bridge. Better facilities and atmosphere, everyone should go at least once though.
 
I hope South Africa fights back and bowl out England before they reach 200 .
 
The Lord's crowd, in particular the members, just seem like a group of old blokes who are there for a day out, with the cricket just being something that happens in the background, rather than actually being there for the cricket.

That Kallis decision looks a shocker, but you win some, you lose some.

Made me laugh when they went off though. Of course you can't see the ball Dale, you've got your eyes closed and you're turning your head away as well. :D
 
The fact is the third umpire must always give the benefit of the doubt to Kallis and he couldn't be absolutely sure. The ICC need release some more detailed guidline for the third umpires. Or maybe two third umpires who have to agree?

Yeah I think this is the way. Just get the 4th umpire or match referee who are just hanging around doing nothing to come into the 3rd umpire's box and make sure he's not missing anything. Doesn't need to be a best of 3 vote or anything, just they all look at it - 3rd umpire makes call, the other 2 have chance to veto. I'm guessing Rod Tucker just needed another set of eyes to see what he passed over.

Oh and thank goodness Philander finally made some runs. I was starting to think all that talk about him being able to bat was VERY optimistic homerism :)
 
The Lord's crowd, in particular the members, just seem like a group of old blokes who are there for a day out, with the cricket just being something that happens in the background, rather than actually being there for the cricket.
That's an apt description for a lot of crowds, whether they're picnicking or wearing watermelons. MCC members are entitled to feel like they're part of some special elite club, but even the average Joe is spending a pretty penny on tickets and beer.
 
This is what I posted on a football forum

Still need to keep it up and not rest on our laurels, still De Villiers, Rudolph and Duminy offering a threat. We still have to score runs, if their tail does what quite a few do against us and add too many runs then they boast Philander, Steyn, Morkel and Kallis, I've always been of the view "what we can do, they can do".

That was at lunch so England had taken out four saffers, but as too often happens we don't make most of a good position. C5 later said they thought England would have expected to bowl them out for 250, from four down and indeed the six down position.


Lots of controversy around two catches off the glove, one seemingly correct, the other not. Unfortunately this may just feed more Indian paranoia about reviews. Talking of which, I think Strauss went back to his overzealous ways with reviews, really should only use them for LBWs when you are absolutely certain he was out and most of the time they're missing or hitting outside the line or something so WASTED.

Also something that has been on my mind recently is the advantage of umpiring errors. If Smith is given out then he has to use his review, if he's not out then the fielding side have to use their's. So which way the umpire leans can decide who is risking their review, even more reason to make them centrally controlled by the (3rd) umpires themselves.


Now England need to polish the tail off, I thought the saffers were engaging in a bit of sportsmanship which the umpires went for with the decision to come off. I've seen England tailenders peppered with short stuff and no backing from the umpires, it's not like both were complete rabbits or hadn't seen it well enough to have scored runs. I think they may have scored more runs last night and England may be a bit more clinical today so they may come to regret it - make hay while the going's good, not if/while the sun shines.

This saffer total may end below par, but I think England have already missed a good opportunity. IF England do finish the job this morning quickly then they may still not be in front by close of play, if they edge in front at all. 54/4 and 163/6 are positions you would to be facing 250 or less from, the latter having seen off most of the batsmen. I think I said earlier England needed to take their chances, that includes not giving much away which unfortunately they have at times.

And don't forget England are without KP now and have Taylor and Bairstow in the side, neither of whom has a Test fifty. England will definitely not want to lose Cook and/or Trott early.

Bairstow 38 runs @ 12.67
Taylor 34 runs @ 34.00

For the first time in the series this is superbly poised, the saffers in a position that might be below par but making a late rally to get there and facing an England batting line-up that has two raw recruits.
 
Jack, did you see Yohan Blake?

No he was too quick I missed him?

Yeah he did half a lap of honour during one of the breaks. Was going around posing like a tiger.

----------

Saw him ring the bell as well obviously, forgot about that.
 
Have to get them out for under 300 or series over. That said I doubt we'll bowl them out in the second innings anyway unless Swann is inspired.
 
Must be a bit disappointed to concede 309, the last four wickets near doubling the total with 146 runs I think it is.

Looks like an overnight lead is highly unlikely, England will want to be no more than 3-4 down by close I'm sure to facilitate the kind of lead we'd want/need
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top