PC: T20 Blast Tournament - Series 1 - (Round 2)

I personally having watched Dawson live in a large amount of games don't think his batting average does him much credit in T20 :yes. If I had him he'd be down as a sort of top 6 player and has opened at county level quite a few times in the past. This year he's actually been batting at 3 in FC cricket.

I'd argue over the point over you having the strongest batting line up ;).

Just a note that Ultimates is now taking over the managing roles of the Leeds Lynx and will be swapping his reserve manager place :).
 
I personally having watched Dawson live in a large amount of games don't think his batting average does him much credit in T20 :yes. If I had him he'd be down as a sort of top 6 player and has opened at county level quite a few times in the past. This year he's actually been batting at 3 in FC cricket.

I'd argue over the point over you having the strongest batting line up ;).

Just a note that Ultimates is now taking over the managing roles of the Leeds Lynx and will be swapping his reserve manager place :).

Well, Next two rounds will make sure that our batting will be unarguably strongest. Dawson and Samson are just backup players ;)
 
Haha, you'll never make me give in :p. I'd get a couple of good pure bowlers in there if I were you otherwise I'd worry about going for a lot of runs ;). You've picked quite a few people who would normally be picked as a 5th bowler at county level in there.
 
Naah. We can chase anything :D

We can chase anything and bowl to anything ;).

M Carberry
C Kieswetter+
L Wright
J Taylor
G Bailey*
N McKenzie
S Al Hasan
D Mascarenhas
M Starc
A Thomas
A Mendis

O Shah
D Malan
D Willey
=TBC=

I'll be honest and admit originally I was going to go for Hussey instead of Bailey, Ajmal instead of Mendis, Onions instead of Thomas and Watto instead of Wright but I think I've picked up more than decent replacements who are all match winners and kept relatively well to the plan I set at the start of round 1 ;). Also got 5 core bowlers in there as well as Wright incase anyone has a bad day :).
 
Haha, you'll never make me give in :p. I'd get a couple of good pure bowlers in there if I were you otherwise I'd worry about going for a lot of runs ;). You've picked quite a few people who would normally be picked as a 5th bowler at county level in there.

Inclusion of so many allrounders is giving a impression that our bowling is weak.

Faulkner: 79 wickets at an avg of 20
Trego: 69 wickets at an avg of 31
Woods: 54 wickets at an avg of 27
Napier: 123 wickets at an avg of 21
Dawson: 31 wickets at an avg of 28
Meschede: 16 wickets at an avg of 23
Watson: 105 wickets at an avg of 23

So basically all of them are pretty good bowlers who happen to bat very decent too. :p
So we've got bowling covered. ;)
 
They may be wicket takers but I think they'll struggle to keep the runs right personally ;).

All just some good banter between managers anyway :D.

Wise works Venk :p.
 
Out of all of them. Only Meshcede is a wild card as he has not played a lot but seem pretty good bowler. Cooke is our wild card in batting. His stats are not that great but he's had a great season last year.

----------

They may be wicket takers but I think they'll struggle to keep the runs right personally ;).

All just some good banter between managers anyway :D.

Wise works Venk :p.

Best way to stop the runs is to take wickets ;)
 
Out of all of them. Only Meshcede is a wild card as he has not played a lot but seem pretty good bowler. Cooke is our wild card in batting. His stats are not that great but he's had a great season last year.

I assume you'll open with Wood and Faulkner? :) (Bowling that is :D)
 
Definitely (in batting) as a ploy to surprise and throw the opponent off in a couple of matches. :p
 
Welcome to the party :cheers

----------

Can we add a rule which require you to give each player a minimum amount of matches so that teams would actually focus on getting 15 players. Rather than getting 11 players and stuffing 4 nothing players just to complete the requirement. This should bring more strategy in place. :spy
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top