Tendulkar v Inzamam TEST CRICKET ONLY

Sachin Tendulkar vs Inzamam Ul Haq


  • Total voters
    95
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not going to lie, while he shouldn't have said that, I can understand his frustrations because of your inability to understand simple and plain English.

Ok, so can I use the choicest of those nasty words and say that I used them because I am frustrated that you guys are unable to understand my argument of how Sachin > Inzamam? So far, everyone here has been understanding English pretty well. English is a pretty complicated language, and it has quite some double meaning to it. I read khan31's replies to my reply of what he was trying to say, and I understand that I read it in a different way (than what he was trying to say; he was not that clear too in explaining).
 
Not my fault Sachin hasn't been able to get a man of the match award since 1998 and only received 2 in test match cricket. Thats just sad.

zMario added 2 Minutes and 27 Seconds later...


I'm not going to lie, while he shouldn't have said that, I can understand his frustrations because of your inability to understand simple and plain English.

Thats what gets me mate. If you post biased opinions then obviously you should be pulled up on it but when you post a balanced POV and still get flagged for being biased thats just wrong! I read what you have to say and don't argue with it as long as its fair or backed up.
 
Sachin doesn't play match for MOM He plays for his countries with full efforts on :)

Shall I predict zMario's reply now? It will be "Why hasnt he taken India to more victories than Inzamam'? If you say its pressure, then he will cleverly refute it (or pass it over!) and will get back to the same 'He hasnt won a MOM award in 10 years blah blah'
 
Idiots ..trying to prove which is impossible,they turn the point whenever they want i don't wanna Insult any player .
 
Ok, so can I use the choicest of those nasty words and say that I used them because I am frustrated that you guys are unable to understand my argument of how Sachin > Inzamam? So far, everyone here has been understanding English pretty well. English is a pretty complicated language, and it has quite some double meaning to it. I read khan31's replies to my reply of what he was trying to say, and I understand that I read it in a different way (than what he was trying to say; he was not that clear too in explaining).
But heres the problem - you don't have a case.

You can't show how Tendulkar has helped his team to win, which is his job as a cricketer.

But I've shown how Inzamam has always helped his team to win, meaning he has done his job.
 
Idiots ..trying to prove which is impossible,they turn the point whenever they want i don't wanna Insult any player .
Please show me where I have insulted Sachin?

Unless calling him a cheater, which is true...(You're not allowed to try to fool the umpire)

zMario added 1 Minutes and 26 Seconds later...

We can say the same of you and some of your Pakistani (sorry, not trying using this word in an offensive tone) friends who defend Inzamam so much, and that too when the argument is heavily in favor of the opposition (i.e. Tendulkar) at 57-13 when I last saw?
Why is it that your Sachin supporters have not been able to defend him so far?

I've given you statistic after statistic, proof after proof, and all you can say stupidly "His average is higher, so he's the better batsman"

Rao Iftikhar Anjum averaged 80.00 in ODIs at one point (seriously). He is now the Sir Don Bradman of ODI Cricket :)
 
But heres the problem - you don't have a case.

You can't show how Tendulkar has helped his team to win, which is his job as a cricketer.

But I've shown how Inzamam has always helped his team to win, meaning he has done his job.

Did you read my argument? It was 'The kind of pressure Sachin faces as a batsman, that alone does not help compete on equal terms with Inzamam when it comes to saving his team in such situations' and you say thats bull...

If we didnt have our cases, we wouldnt be arguing here for so long. We're not as stupid as you think us to be.
 
For your knowledge i didn't Say that you insult someone.. here but sachin is not a cheater he walks off himself if it's out
 
For your knowledge i didn't Say that you insult someone.. here but sachin is not a cheater he walks off himself if it's out
No he doesn't.

He sits there, and he tries to fool the umpire into thinking that hes not out when he is.

The umpire gives him out. Sachin shakes his head viciously, and acts like he should have not been given out. Then he puts up a T signal.

And then the replays on the big screen show Tendulkar's bat was NOWHERE near the ball, and he was struck in front of the stumps. Plumb LBW. THe umpire gives the decision.

Then Sachin goes off the field, shaking his head and how he should be not out.

And when he decides to get injured, he starts giving players out from the dressing room.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlkvCSO0-7E

Fast forward to the LBW appeal, and then I believe 1:35 - 1:45 and watch Tendulkar's BS
 
Why is it that your Sachin supporters have not been able to defend him so far?

I've given you statistic after statistic, proof after proof, and all you can say stupidly "His average is higher, so he's the better batsman"

Rao Iftikhar Anjum averaged 80.00 in ODIs at one point (seriously). He is now the Sir Don Bradman of ODI Cricket :)

For all your arguments, counter ones have been given. Take the pain of reading back through the thread.

Sayonara! Good night, and sweet bad dreams of Sachin > Inzamam:p
 
Did you read my argument? It was 'The kind of pressure Sachin faces as a batsman, that alone does not help compete on equal terms with Inzamam when it comes to saving his team in such situations' and you say thats bull...

If we didnt have our cases, we wouldnt be arguing here for so long. We're not as stupid as you think us to be.
What kind of extra pressure does Sachin face? Inzamam is also a batsman, AND was Captain.

Sachin was just a batsman. Its just the other way around now, isn't it.
 
a Khel ratna award to Sachin tendulkar Proves he deserves the Legendary batsmen better than Inzi spot.
 
For all your arguments, counter ones have been given. Take the pain of reading back through the thread.

Sayonara! Good night, and sweet bad dreams of Sachin > Inzamam:p
And you've received counter-counter arguments, which you guys don't even respond to.

Instead you fall back on the oh, Sachin's average is higher, so he's better.

Ridiculous.

zMario added 0 Minutes and 46 Seconds later...

a Khel ratna award to Sachin tendulkar Proves he deserves the Legendary batsmen better than Inzi spot.
Erm - thats an Indian only award, he's not eligible for it.

I'm sorry Inzamam wasn't born in India, boohoo, oh you guys wish you could have a master-class batsman who could save your team from losing when Sachin chokes.
 
From a completely neutral perspective.

We have two excellent cricketers. I think Inzy was slightly easier to have a plan against. Not saying it was easy to bowl to him, but I always felt we had some kind of plan which could work. It's only very slightly then that Sachin is the better player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top