Those who are equally poor at both, although his list is quite wrong by including Pathan, Ajit and Vettori.Leicester Fox said:What?
Those who are equally poor at both, although his list is quite wrong by including Pathan, Ajit and Vettori.Leicester Fox said:What?
i dont agree i think an allrounder is a guy that can bat and bowl at an international standard....they dont have to be "equal"...Garry Sobers batted at an average of 59 and bowled at an average of 34...there isnt an allrounder even close to those figuresLeicester Fox said:oh i see. i didn'tget it because those players aren't that bad. I still stand by my point of view
Sobers batting average was 57, not 59.stereotype said:i dont agree i think an allrounder is a guy that can bat and bowl at an international standard....they dont have to be "equal"...Garry Sobers batted at an average of 59 and bowled at an average of 34...there isnt an allrounder even close to those figures
I was using figures based on memory...a batting average of 57.78 and a Bowling average of 34.03 (added in is the fact Sobers bowled Fast Medium, Offspin and Legspin) plus Sobers has the record for the highest maiden century ever with 365 not outwfdu_ben91 said:Sobers batting average was 57, not 59.
Are you forgetting Jacques Kallis' batting average of 55 and bowling average of 31?
Techinquely, those figures are just better then Sobers'.
why wouldnt you just round decimals?wfdu_ben91 said:Could use the obvious way and say averaged a tad or two of 57 and a half?