The PlanetCricket.org Mafia - End game

[asprin]

Imagine CK's luck if User comes back and says Simon's lynch is not valid.

He, however, has fixed it though.

 

[zwarrior]

Imagine CK's luck if User comes back and says Simon's lynch is not valid.

He, however, has fixed it though.

Even if simon had not fixed it, he could have fixed it later. There is no deadline, so it's all good I guess.

 

[Gaurav_7]

Lol guys, it's valid! Too many pages to go through which I like. Activity was great today. Here it is, I am on mobile so pardon all the plain text.

Day 2

He gathered all the attention for the wrong reasons. His response to many wasn't upto the mark and they all were sure he had to go today. There were a lot of thoughts that went through everyones minds. But after a bit of hesitation, Simon decided it was time to vote for CerealKiller's ban! And that was it. His profile was deleted and banned. It was found:

Spoiler

CerealKiller was CazC30, serial killer, self aligned.

It is now night 2. Please send in your roles asap and within 24 hours.

 

[Gaurav_7]

Night 2​

planetcricket.org,
Mafia Games Forum
May 16 2017, 12.20 PM IST.
​

Seven of them remained. It was going to be a good sleep as they took out the serial killer.

---

Do this, I will do that.

Okay.

Done.

Let's sleep.

---

He did the same thing again.

---

It was morning and all the profiles were perfectly fine. No one had been banned!

---

It is now day 3, with 7 alive, it takes 4 for a majority.

 

[Perfect Square]

Good thing for us (townies), as no one was banned.

Do this, I will do that.

Okay.

Done.

Let's sleep.

I think there are only two anti-townies left. Both are mafia. One can perform night kill/ban action and other can't.
The question is, why mafia didn't banned/killed a user? Maybe he was role-blocked or something?

 

[zwarrior]

Glad that all of us are alive.

But, I am confused. Looks like mafias cannot kill anyone. Or were they blocked ? What is their role ? Very confusing.

He did the same thing again.

Meaning, vigilante again remained silent ? Or, is there any vigilante at all ?

 

[asprin]

No bans on the night could mean 3 things:-

1. Mafia was blocked and there is no Vigilante role.
2. Mafia was blocked and vigilante decided to play it safe again.
3. There is no block role. The mafia do not possess night kill role and vigilante played it safe.

Going by the night log, #2 seems the most probable thing to have taken place.

I don't think #3 can be true because the chances of vigilante being the only one left with a night kill role look bleak.

In either case, if there indeed is a vigilante and he decided not to ban anyone for the second night in a row, I think that's a mistake on his part. He should have taken the shot.

 

[RUDI]

Just for the record: I blocked Simon again last night. Thus , he has the only killing role left. His alliance however is still unknown ...

Looks like mafias cannot kill anyone

That's what I said from the clues User left us.

 

[Perfect Square]

Just for the record: I blocked Simon again last night. Thus , he has the only killing role left. His alliance however is still unknown ...

You are role claiming? Are you role-blocker?

 

[zwarrior]

No bans on the night could mean 3 things:-

1. Mafia was blocked and there is no Vigilante role.
2. Mafia was blocked and vigilante decided to play it safe again.
3. There is no block role. The mafia do not possess night kill role and vigilante played it safe.

Going by the night log, #2 seems the most probable thing to have taken place.

I don't think #3 can be true because the chances of vigilante being the only one left with a night kill role look bleak.

In either case, if there indeed is a vigilante and he decided not to ban anyone for the second night in a row, I think that's a mistake on his part. He should have taken the shot.

How is it a mistake ? If he is not sure about who the mafia is, he shouldn't lynch someone who later might turn out to be a townie. Now, one townie and a serial killer is dead and he was probably killed by serial killer. Mafias are not able to kill. So, clearly we have the upper hand.

If what rudolph saying is true ( blocking ), then the only one who posses the killing abilities is the one rudolph blocked and vigilante. So, vigilante should play real careful now. Suppose vigilante kills a role- blocker, then mafia will be freed and they might be able to kill someone.

Also, ali- whom did you "track" yesterday night ?

Now the question is, should we trust rudolph and ali ?[DOUBLEPOST=1494924200][/DOUBLEPOST]

You are role claiming? Are you role-blocker?

Didn't you read the previous posts ? He role claimed long time back.

 

[RUDI]

You are role claiming? Are you role-blocker?

Mate , seems like you are not following this game. Have a look back about ten pages

 

[zwarrior]

That's what I said from the clues User left us.

Or you blocked the mafia who has ability to kill. Anything is possible.

 

[RUDI]

He did the same thing again.

If what Rudolph saying is true ( blocking )

Here is your answer, I am as transparent as can be. Let rid this site of all the scum once and for all.

Lynch: Simon

If he admits he has a killing ability and convinces me that it's for the betterment of this site, then I will unlynch him.

 

[zwarrior]

Here is your answer, I am as transparent as can be. Let rid this site of all the scum once and for all.

Lynch: Simon

If he admits he has a killing ability and convinces me that it's for the betterment of this site, then I will unlynch him.

Ok. That matches. But what about night 1's write up ?

He knew he was an important one but played it safe for the night.

I don't think this is relatable to role blocker ?

 

[AliB]

Interestingly all are still going, if Rudolph's roleclaim is to be trusted it's the man himself, Simon! who has the killing abilities.

F.O.S. Simon