The PlanetCricket.org Mafia - End game

[RUDI]

Ok. That matches. But what about night 1's write up ?

He knew he was an important one but played it safe for the night.

I don't think this is relatable to role blocker ?

It's possible, but what else then? Why will a member with night killing ability not use it in two consecutive nights? It just doesn't make sense ... the guy is either inactive or lazy or just too complacent ...[DOUBLEPOST=1494925713][/DOUBLEPOST]

Interestingly all are still going, if Rudolph's roleclaim is to be trusted it's the man himself, Simon! who has the killing abilities.

F.O.S. Simon

Who have you tracked last night?

 

[AliB]

It's possible, but what else then? Why will a member with night killing ability not use it in two consecutive nights? It just doesn't make sense ... the guy is either inactive or lazy or just too complacent ...[DOUBLEPOST=1494925713][/DOUBLEPOST]
Who have you tracked last night?

zwarrior, for sure! He had no targets if User is to be trusted.

 

[asprin]

zwarrior, for sure! He had no targets if User is to be trusted.

Help me understand the meaning of this. When you say "zwarrior had no targets", does that mean zwarrior did not target anyone at night or no one targeted zwarrior at night?

 

[AliB]

Help me understand the meaning of this. When you say "zwarrior had no targets", does that mean zwarrior did not target anyone at night or no one targeted zwarrior at night?

He didn't target anyone.

 

[asprin]

So if Ali and Rudoph are telling the truth, then Simon is sure to be anti-town. It would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.

 

[asprin]

He did the same thing again.

Here is your answer, I am as transparent as can be.

I wouldn't say that. After re-reading night 1 and night 2 logs, I'm now confident that there indeed is a vigilante. The "He did the same thing again" is referring to the vigilante here and not your block.

The reason is that we had this on night 1:

He knew he was an important one but played it safe for the night.

So it's possible that you're saying the truth but it can't be authenticated by "He did the same thing again" because that applies to vigilante and not you.

By the way, props to User for constantly updating the OP with all events. Makes keeping track of things very easy

 

[AliB]

So if Ali and Rudoph are telling the truth, then Simon is sure to be anti-town. It would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.

I'm true on my part for sure don't have the right to blame Simon. But if he's the one blocked on successive nights resulting in no ban from the mafia side, it's a straight forward call. Still, let's wait for his defense, he can be trapped in the same way CK was.[DOUBLEPOST=1494928547][/DOUBLEPOST]@Perfect Square needs to be more vocal here, he's been silent for a while now.

 

[RUDI]

Just for the record: I blocked Simon again last night. Thus , he has the only killing role left. His alliance however is still unknown ...

I wouldn't say that. After re-reading night 1 and night 2 logs, I'm now confident that there indeed is a vigilante. The "He did the same thing again" is referring to the vigilante here and not your block.

So it's possible that you're saying the truth but it can't be authenticated by "He did the same thing again" because that applies to vigilante and not you.

It is definitely possible, this is why I said his alliance is still unknown. Vigilante or Mafia , I'm hoping when he comes online to share some light on this.

 

[Perfect Square]

Mate , seems like you are not following this game. Have a look back about ten pages

o yeah. Just remember now

 

[Perfect Square]

needs to be more vocal here, he's been silent for a while now.

Online now.

So if Ali and Rudoph are telling the truth, then Simon is sure to be anti-town. It would be interesting to see what he has to say about this.

By the look of things I also suspect Simon is an Anti-Townie. Lets wait for Simon to hear from his side.

 

[Samarth27.09]

If you want anyone's replacement... Then I'm in...

 

[SiriusBlack]

Okay.

Done.

If that doesn't imply no one was roleblocked, then as an experienced mod, I don't know what does. These are clearly two people in cohorts, and both confident that what they'd done was successful. That way we can be certain that the mafia don't have a NK anymore so that places at as a great advantage.

I wouldn't say that. After re-reading night 1 and night 2 logs, I'm now confident that there indeed is a vigilante. The "He did the same thing again" is referring to the vigilante here and not your block.

^This. There is nothing to indicate that there was a successful roleblock tonight. I'm 100% sure Rudolph is lying because we all came to a consensus that there was a successful roleblock on Night 1, and there's nothing to indicate the same last night while he claims to have blocked the same person. Like I said, I'm quite confident that there aren't three NK roles, because that would be overkill in a 9 player setup. The vig is playing it safe, but there's always the possibility for him to target the wrong person at night, and the mod probably wouldn't take that risk because that makes it too mafia sided.

Here's what I think. Rudolph is one of the mafia. He knows that the mafia don't have a night kill and the bans were done by a serial killer. So what does he do? He uses the fact that there was a possible roleblock on Night 1, and claims to be the roleblocker himself. He asserts that there's a mafia night killer even though he knows there isn't one, and he tries to have one of us lynched using his roleclaim. Who does he go after? Of course, the only person who has gone after him since the beginning. How does he do it? He deflects all of my questions, says some cryptic shit about saving our site, and gets off Day 1 as someone forced to talk like that.

Now something I'm less sure about. Who lets him off the hook? Asprin. I read his post and decide to play it safe since there's other scummy play going on. It could be a very well thought out plan between the two, since I don't see or recall any post where asprin had anything significant to say about Rudolph. I'm willing to hear him out on this.

lynch: Rudolph

 

[RUDI]

I'm 100% sure Rudolph is lying because we all came to a consensus that there was a successful roleblock on Night 1, and there's nothing to indicate the same last night while he claims to have blocked the same person.

You agreed with us on day 2 that someone was blocked on night 1, right? I said I am going to block the same person again, which I did. Jack Ryder also requested this. Why now do you all of the sudden not agree?
I'll tell you why ... all of the evidence is pointing towards you.

Welcome to PlanetCricket.org mafia, Rudolph.

You are MattW, roleblocker, town aligned.

Simon come clean, as I said earlier : If you admit that you have a night killing role, I'll unlynch you. I'll still block you at night because you will most definitely want to kill me.
What's your role? Vigilante or Mafia?

 

[CerealKiller]

You agreed with us on day 2 that someone was blocked on night 1, right? I said I am going to block the same person again, which I did. Jack Ryder also requested this. Why now do you all of the sudden not agree?
I'll tell you why ... all of the evidence is pointing towards you.



Simon come clean, as I said earlier : If you admit that you have a night killing role, I'll unlynch you. I'll still block you at night because you will most definitely want to kill me.
What's your role? Vigilante or Mafia?

You can't quote directly from the mod. You can be modkilled for doing that.

 

[RUDI]

You can't quote directly from the mod. You can be modkilled for doing that.

I've already asked his permission yesterday