The PlanetCricket.org Mafia - End game

[Till Valhalla]

F.O.S : Everybody.
Rudolph and Ali are supporting each other very well here.
Asprin and Perfect Square were in Hibernation modes for 2 days but suddenly on Day 3 they are active. Asprin has previously stated there was nothing significant to comment on and I don't think Night 2 had anything significant so he has changed his stand.
Simon and Zwarrior I am 50-50 on them they both are playing well. They definitely helped nailing down serial killer but if they are mafia they wouldn't know CK was SK hence they tried to lynch away another townie.

Now you all realize mafia doesn't have a killing role I have been saying that from the previous day. What scares me is what roles does they have if not Night Kill?

 

[asprin]

Now something I'm less sure about. Who lets him off the hook? Asprin. I read his post and decide to play it safe since there's other scummy play going on. It could be a very well thought out plan between the two, since I don't see or recall any post where asprin had anything significant to say about Rudolph. I'm willing to hear him out on this.

You're right. I was the one who put forward the theory of Rudolph's account being hacked. It was the only thing that made sense to me since he was talking smack.

But if other's agreed with me and didn't think of anything else, how is that my fault? I said what I felt and I guess it made sense to others too. And if you look at my post history, I've also asked questions of him whenever I felt he was being countered with valid points. I've done that with every member who seemed scummy to me.

 

[asprin]

Asprin and Perfect Square were in Hibernation modes for 2 days but suddenly on Day 3 they are active.

So would you rather have me post scarcely?

 

[Till Valhalla]

So would you rather have me post scarcely?

I am asking for the reason behind change.

 

[asprin]

I am asking for the reason behind change.

Not intentional, I can tell you that. I felt like I could chime in and I did. I still feel it hasn't been drastic though.

 

[Till Valhalla]

I think we all reveal who we are playing unless and until someone thinks that will take the fun out of it. After everybody reveals their role we can guess who will do more harm to the planetcricket.[DOUBLEPOST=1494948609][/DOUBLEPOST]

I think we all reveal who we are playing unless and until someone thinks that will take the fun out of it. After everybody reveals their role we can guess who will do more harm to the planetcricket.

Like Swacker was CerealKiller
CerealKiller was Cazc30[DOUBLEPOST=1494948708][/DOUBLEPOST]

I'll

I don't think MattW will be a role blocker most probably he will be the Vigilante trying to get his site back.

 

[asprin]

About Rudolph's claim of being MattW - I'm starting to think he is faking it. Reasons are:

1. I doubt User would have given him the green signal to quote his PM.
2. Right after that reveal, he says, "I will unlynch you if you have a night kill role". Why? Wouldn't that make him (Simon) all the more dangerous. Then why unlynch him? On the contrary, you would hope that he is finished off during the day itself.
3. Somewhat agree with Jack's theory that MattW would more probably be a vigilante who is trying to restore his site back. In other words, it makes sense for him to have an attacking role than a defending one.

 

[SiriusBlack]

You agreed with us on day 2 that someone was blocked on night 1, right? I said I am going to block the same person again, which I did. Jack Ryder also requested this. Why now do you all of the sudden not agree?

bruh
You're basically Donald Trump in a debate. You ignore everything of substance.

there was a successful roleblock on Night 1, and there's nothing to indicate the same last night while he claims to have blocked the same person.

Right there. I don't buy your claim. There was a roleblock but it sure as hell wasn't from you.

As I said yesterday, Rudolph would be one to look at at night. Since then, he has come after me for saying that and tried to shift the blame onto me. Before that, he passed his call for a mass roleclaim as sarcasm (which, admittedly, I bought). The only two people in some kind of actual conversation yesterday were me and swacker, and the only person involved with us was Rudolph. What are the odds that he decides to do the exact same thing I pointed out to be wary about, just to keep himself off the radar? And, I know I've agreed with him, but he was the first one to suggest that there was a third party role. It could be very possible that he used his knowledge to provide sound analysis from a townie point of view.

The dots are there, but I can't be sure if we can connect them. Thoughts, anyone?
FOS: Rudolph

, and you never responded to my suspicions here, and went on to talk smack, as asprin put very well. You aren't the roleblocker. I already claimed vanilla. I have no night actions for you to block.

You're right. I was the one who put forward the theory of Rudolph's account being hacked. It was the only thing that made sense to me since he was talking smack.

But if other's agreed with me and didn't think of anything else, how is that my fault? I said what I felt and I guess it made sense to others too. And if you look at my post history, I've also asked questions of him whenever I felt he was being countered with valid points. I've done that with every member who seemed scummy to me.

I think that's fair. Your suspicion was valid, but Rudolph never followed through on it, so that's on him.

• Right after that reveal, he says, "I will unlynch you if you have a night kill role". Why? Wouldn't that make him (Simon) all the more dangerous. Then why unlynch him? On the contrary, you would hope that he is finished off during the day itself.

• Somewhat agree with Jack's theory that MattW would more probably be a vigilante who is trying to restore his site back. In other words, it makes sense for him to have an attacking role than a defending one.

Exactly. Literally who unlynches a NK role lmao. And Matt prolly wouldn't be a RB, probably something more significant.

 

[SiriusBlack]

Don't quote any communication you receive from me.

yah just lynch Rudolph already.

 

[zwarrior]

Zwarrior I am 50-50 on them they both are playing well. They definitely helped nailing down serial killer but if they are mafia they wouldn't know CK was SK hence they tried to lynch away another townie.

I agree that I started the lynching CK bandwagon. But even you were behind it. Infact you voted for him way before simon did.

My question is, look at the bolded part. You concentrated only on me and simon. Now, why should it be only simon and I ? You could be mafia and tried to lynch a townie. Rudolph could be that. Even ali could be that.

Now you all realize mafia doesn't have a killing role I have been saying that from the previous day. What scares me is what roles does they have if not Night Kill?

Exactly. If mafia doesn't have killing role, then there has to be something big.

I doubt User would have given him the green signal to quote his PM.

Yup. Even I don't agree that. There is no way Gaurav would have given green signal. He said in the first post only not to quote the message sent by him.

You aren't the roleblocker. I already claimed vanilla. I have no night actions for you to block.

You claimed vanilla. Alright. But how can anyone believe that ? Similary, rudolph claimed roleblocker. And ali claimed to be 'tracker' ? ( I seriously doubt this. Why isn't anyone picking up on that ? ) I can't believe them. Same way, I can't believe you too.

 

[SiriusBlack]

You claimed vanilla. Alright. But how can anyone believe that ? Similary, rudolph claimed roleblocker. And ali claimed to be 'tracker' ? ( I seriously doubt this. Why isn't anyone picking up on that ? ) I can't believe them. Same way, I can't believe you too.

Sure, you can't. What we can agree on is that I have been specific and coherent throughout, and Rudolph has been sounding like he's rerunning for 2020. Whose claim would be more believable in that context?

 

[Till Valhalla]

My question is, look at the bolded part. You concentrated only on me and simon. Now, why should it be only simon and I ? You could be mafia and tried to lynch a townie. Rudolph could be that. Even ali could be that.

I have put various reasons for everybody.

Same way, I can't believe you too

I suggest revealing who we are playing and then analyzing who can be mafia.

 

[zwarrior]

I think we all reveal who we are playing unless and until someone thinks that will take the fun out of it. After everybody reveals their role we can guess who will do more harm to the planetcricket.

I am fine. But my only issue is, everyone should post at the same time otherwise mafias might try to change the role and post. But, I am not sure how this will help us ?

Sure, you can't. What we can agree on is that I have been specific and coherent throughout, and Rudolph has been sounding like he's rerunning for 2020. Whose claim would be more believable in that context?

I really can't answer that now.
But I am more doubtful on Rudolph than I have on you.

 

[asprin]

Alright. I'm gonna take a big leap of faith here.

Lynch: Rudolph

The only reason I'm going with this is because I strongly disagree on the "asked for permission from User" part. There is very little chance that he would have allowed Rudolph to quote that PM as true. It's a risk, I agree. We might end up getting rid of a roleblocker, but what if he turns out to be mafia?

Pros outweigh the cons.

 

[RUDI]

@User2010 please confirm that I did get your permission.
@Simon as you stated you are an old hand at playing and modding Mafia games. Nicely played thus far, you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not everyone all of the time...

You keep trolling me because you think I am a soft target. Fair enough, I am fairly new to Mafia. What you fail to do is answer a simple question " Are you the vigilante or Mafia? "
You never reacted to my question, rather cleverly tried to make me out to be a liar... Quote me on this, I did block you on two consecutive nights.
And User will confirm this in the end.
My Lynch stays. If the others believe your BS that's on them.

Alright. I'm gonna take a big leap of faith here.

Lynch: Rudolph

The only reason I'm going with this is because I strongly disagree on the "asked for permission from User" part. There is very little chance that he would have allowed Rudolph to quote that PM as true. It's a risk, I agree. We might end up getting rid of a roleblocker, but what if he turns out to be mafia?

Pros outweigh the cons.

Congratulations asprin, you are playing into Simon's hand, when will you learn. You've costed us townies two games in a row with your funniness.

I think we all reveal who we are playing unless and until someone thinks that will take the fun out of it. After everybody reveals their role we can guess who will do more harm to the planetcricket.

By all means Jack, who do you play?