The PlanetCricket.org Mafia - End game

[CerealKiller]

What! I started my post with the word crazy you see?
I think I am seeing an alliance of three persons.

Already cooking khiyali pulaos

 

[RUDI]

Ugh, for real. Going after someone is the total opposite of being defensive.

Care to explain why you are going after me?

 

[Till Valhalla]

AliB-CerealKiller-PerfectSquare. I feel an alliance between them.

 

[Perfect Square]

I had doubts on few on Day 1 including AliB.
So I'm thinking he is behind all the night actions.

F.O.S : AliB

AliB-CerealKiller-PerfectSquare. I feel an alliance between them.

You're posts suggest that you are trying to attack more than to defend yourself. I'm feeling you're an anti-townie.

 

[Till Valhalla]

You're posts suggest that you are trying to attack more than to defend yourself. I'm feeling you're an anti-townie.

Till now nobody has attacked me hence no defense from my side.

 

[SiriusBlack]

Care to explain why you are going after me?

I did in my post.

I feel that every time I shift the attention onto you, you deflect it rather than defending yourself. It's not Day 1, and none of my suspicion is unfounded, so there's no reason for your behavior. I feel like that's more in need of an explanation than anything else.

On Ali, I'm interested to know why he has not been posting despite being online. He seemed really jumpy yesterday and now he's AWOL.

 

[Till Valhalla]

On Ali, I'm interested to know why he has not been posting despite being online. He seemed really jumpy yesterday and now he's AWOL.

I think he is waiting for instructions from his partners on how to post.[DOUBLEPOST=1494794216][/DOUBLEPOST]

partners

Partner/Partners

 

[RUDI]

I did in my post.

I feel that every time I shift the attention onto you, you deflect it rather than defending yourself. It's not Day 1, and none of my suspicion is unfounded, so there's no reason for your behavior. I feel like that's more in need of an explanation than anything else.

On Ali, I'm interested to know why he has not been posting despite being online. He seemed really jumpy yesterday and now he's AWOL.

You are seeing things you agree with me the one moment the next you sus me. You are not making sense seriously. What do you have to hide? Your suspicious behavior is really drawing negative attention to yourself.
FOS : SIMON

 

[SiriusBlack]

Again, deflection.
I've been after you all day today, that isn't flip flopping. You're not addressing anything that I raised here:

As I said yesterday, Rudolph would be one to look at at night. Since then, he has come after me for saying that and tried to shift the blame onto me. Before that, he passed his call for a mass roleclaim as sarcasm (which, admittedly, I bought). The only two people in some kind of actual conversation yesterday were me and swacker, and the only person involved with us was Rudolph. What are the odds that he decides to do the exact same thing I pointed out to be wary about, just to keep himself off the radar? And, I know I've agreed with him, but he was the first one to suggest that there was a third party role. It could be very possible that he used his knowledge to provide sound analysis from a townie point of view.

The dots are there, but I can't be sure if we can connect them. Thoughts, anyone?
FOS: Rudolph

As far as I'm concerned, I've remained firm on my stance and you've been circumventing everything from the beginning.

lynch: Rudolph[DOUBLEPOST=1494794868][/DOUBLEPOST]

I think he is waiting for instructions from his partners on how to post.

He's viewing the thread as I type, I hope he has something to say.
Your idea might be true, but it has been a while since the day started and Ali should at least say something. That makes it all the more suspicious.

 

[Till Valhalla]

He's viewing the thread as I type,

Once again vanished.

 

[RUDI]

You are definitely not putting PC. net first, you want us to loose the the site. Play the game not the player.
Lynch : Simon

 

[RUDI]

Again, deflection.
I've been after you all day today, that isn't flip flopping. You're not addressing anything that I raised here:

What have you raised?

 

[Gaurav_7]

If @AliB isn't going to post despite being active, I might look at replacing him. This is so frustrating to see tbh.

 

[zwarrior]

It could also be that the vigilante (Town aligned was blocked)

No. Vigilante was not blocked. The write up, 'he played it safe'. Doesn't this mean that he chose not to kill anyone and not role blocked ?

Feels bad to see myself getting banned.

I think from the writeup it's clear that there are two Mafias, one without killing powers, an anti-town third party and a pro-town roleblocker. There was only one ban, so one must've been blocked by the latter.

And you don't think that there is a pro-town vigilante ?

Also, I did not understand what you said. Do you mean to say that two mafias are - 1st mafia-one without killing powers and 2nd mafia- an anti-town third party

I think Mafia cannot Ban people but they have some different roles which they have performed. If that's the case the ban was imposed by Town Vigilante.[DOUBLEPOST=1494777775][/DOUBLEPOST]I still have my doubts on AliB hence.

Exactly my thoughts on the bolded part. But wouldn't it be possible that one of the mafia was role blocked ?

Also, I am pretty sure vigilante did not kill us. "played it safe for the night." only means that the person did not choose to kill/ban someone.

Just had a crazy theory what if people are being banned automatically, Mafia cannot select them but every night one of the town person is banned randomly?

I don't think a person will be banned randomly.

 

[SiriusBlack]

What have you raised?

You can play dumb all you want. I have all day. I've separated the sentences below so you can follow.

As I said yesterday, Rudolph would be one to look at at night.

Since then, he has come after me for saying that and tried to shift the blame onto me.

Before that, he passed his call for a mass roleclaim as sarcasm (which, admittedly, I bought).

The only two people in some kind of actual conversation yesterday were me and swacker, and the only person involved with us was Rudolph.

What are the odds that he decides to do the exact same thing I pointed out to be wary about, just to keep himself off the radar?

And, I know I've agreed with him, but he was the first one to suggest that there was a third party role.

It could be very possible that he used his knowledge to provide sound analysis from a townie point of view.

The dots are there, but I can't be sure if we can connect them. Thoughts, anyone?

[DOUBLEPOST=1494823767][/DOUBLEPOST]

If @AliB isn't going to post despite being active, I might look at replacing him. This is so frustrating to see tbh.

I've been suspecting that he'd been silenced but that clears it up. literally wut