To put into context, they were one of the best teams of all time, and how many 5 match test series did they lose, so think it very unjust to criticise his captaincy in that series
"unjust" ?
Completely fair, the England side was a very very good side, Jones, Flintoff, Hoggard and Harmison were an awesome bowling unit and the batting line up of Trescothick, Strauss, Vaughan, Bell, Pietersen, Flintoff, Jones and Giles one of the best around.
England played very well, doesn't mean the captaincy isn't open to criticism. You're taking one series which we won and I've said was one of only two tough series that Vaughan won, to defend his captaincy. That's like suggesting if England beat Spain in a football match and got some very dross results against very dross sides that the captain/manager/team were beyond criticism
----------
surely it would be well cheeky of england to exclude pietersen from the central contracts and then pick him to tour india in less than a month?
It would be wrong, to pick him that is. It is probably just to make a statement about him being a very naughty boy (he's not the messiah you know
)
re Vaughan's captaincy stats.
vs WIN/BAN/NZE : P23 W20 D2 L1 (Won 86.96%)
vs IND/PAK/SRI : P11 W0 D7 L4 (Won 0.00%)
vs AUS/SAF : P17 W6 D5 L6 (Won 35.29%)
Vaughan won 14 out of 15 against windies and Bangladesh. Four of those six wins against the aussies and saffers came in those two 2-1 wins I mentioned, other than that he won just two games in two Tests against South Africa, Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka in 18 attempts.
He won only four Tests coming from behind (1st innings deficit), one each against New Zealand and West Indies having trailed by 65 runs, against South Africa having trailed by a mere 8 runs and the biggest after trailing by 179 but only against New Zealand who were bowled out for just 114 in their 2nd innings.