I'm not sure why Sulaiman and surendar believed my claim so easily, it could be they're trying to get me onside, or it could be that they're simply evaluating the game well since I know my claim is true. It could also be that they're both vanilla, and using their roles they can guess that mine is true. Not sure which one.
I think the point I've tried to stress is that we should be sceptical at all times of all claims; yours and mine included. It isn't evaluating the game well to not critically appraise claims. Even if your claim is true, and I don't know if it is or not yet, no-one should just accept it without discussion.
As I've said a few times before mafia players like to go under the radar and talk about other players rather than justify themselves. If both Sulaiman and surendar were vanillas that ought to make them more not less suspicious as it leaves one fewer vanilla in the game.
Going back to what I said before the good players are the ones who challenge everything. With fake claims I don't think character or role claiming is going to confirm many people as definite town.
----------
I mean analysis on the role/characters. Like how Surendar and I did.
I don't see much point analysing the roles. It's a closed setup so Varun can put what he likes in. There are some SK variants with a psychologist rather than a cop and I suppose someone like Barney could be seen as a jailkeeper but as I stressed before we shouldn't think of this as an open setup C7 type game with a theme.
----------
So, for you Miggs should be in for Barney ?
I don't know who Miggs is. They're not mentioned in the wikipedia article.
----------
Final thought for now. Chilton is someone who could be anti-town and there is also scope here for individuals, changing alignments and masons (Lector/Clarice?).
The theme doesn't lend to a classic town/mafia setup which is one of the reasons I think there may be some unusual roles around.