Uni ftw

[Simbazz]

Presumeably one or both of you have a computer copy though. You didn't just write it without several previous drafts?

Most probably somewhere.

 

[Highlander999]

Help:

Compare and contrast two anthropological theories of female subordination and describe why debating issues of womens power can be problematic.

I might just try and find an easier question

 

[Will_NA]

I can see why you're confused. 'Cotrast' isn't a word. Hope that helps.

 

[ZoraxDoom]

LOL Brilliant question. Add something in about their nagging and constant need for attention. That'll make you popular

 

[Highlander999]

and describe why debating issues of womens power can be problematic.

Because they never shut up. End of essay

 

[Will_NA]

That is a brilliant question though. Discuss how explaining the insignificance of female opinion may cause problems.

 

[ste_mc_efc]

"Women can't think rationally and without emotion. Fact. This is due to ovaries boobies and having long hair."

Deffo get an A.

 

[Highlander999]

Well, after no help from any of you gys (not that I expected any) I have found a slightly easier question:

How far do you agree with the assertion that parental-love is an innate, biological mechanism?

I actually went to this lecture so know what it is about

 

[evertonfan]

I think what Ste says is worthy of being showcased at Oxford. It's probably the most well constructed answer to any question ever.

 

[Highlander999]

I'd only give it an A- He missed out the comma after "ovaries"

If I didn't have to re-sit this if I fail it, I would give that answer a go

 

[Will_NA]

If your Mum's not some fat chav slagging it off with every street cleaner she meets while your Dad's in prison for rugby tackling a baby, you have a better chance of getting an A in Maths.

Model answer.

 

[ste_mc_efc]

Well, after no help from any of you gys (not that I expected any) I have found a slightly easier question:

I skimmed through a book (not sure if that is the right word) called "The Origins of Emotions" which was suggesting that a man can only "love" a woman for roughly 7 years, basically the time required to have a baby, and that baby to grow old enough to complete the basic requirements for life i.e forage for food.

I didn't read it properly, but I think it went on to talk about how environmental factors have altered this. It's available on-line as a PDF, I should probably find it again as I meant to read it but never got around to it.

There will be some sort of biological mechanism to care for and look after a child until it is self sufficient,lots of the more complex species need this as a requirement for survival. However long this lasts I can't really say, it could be life-long, however I doubt it is unconditional. If I were to decide to become a sex offender/serial killer I am pretty sure my parents would think less of me.

 

[ZoraxDoom]

Actually there are several incidents where kids have gone onto a life of crime, but their parents would still love them. They would be in like denial and trying to claim their kid didn't do it. It's lilke thier viewsof what a criminal is is clashing with their love of their child...

I heard that thing where we are 'in love' only because we want to reproduce with that person as well. Humans aren't meant to have life-long partners. We weren't built that way.

EDIT: Just realised Tom, you should have used that as your excuse for breaking up with your gf

 

[ste_mc_efc]

EDIT: Just realised Tom, you should have used that as your excuse for breaking up with your gf

"Humans are only supposed to stay with each other long enough to produce a child that can survive, so I have to jib you off, sorry."

"It's only been 1 month, though?"

"I'm impatient. I am going to pursue a relationship with a mayflay, again I am sorry."

 

[Highlander999]

Don't even joke about children. My worse nightmare at the moment, would be for something like that to happen