Im surprised that there is doubt that Vettori can be classified as an all-rounder.
The man has 3492 runs and 303 wickets! What more do you want?
Exactly!!!
Im surprised that there is doubt that Vettori can be classified as an all-rounder.
The man has 3492 runs and 303 wickets! What more do you want?
Fact is Vettori would make any side in the world as would Kallis.
Vettori would make the side because of the benefit of Kallis being the ll-round pace bowler. If Kallis wasn't in then there would be a need for 3 pace bowlers and that would leave just one spot for a spinner and it goes to Murali.
Vettori is about the third decent player NZ have ever had but jesus the way they crap on about Vettori you would think they were talking about Keith Miller, Imran Kahn or Sir Garfield Sobers.
Vettori is about the third decent player NZ have ever had but jesus the way they crap on about Vettori you would think they were talking about Keith Miller, Imran Kahn or Sir Garfield Sobers.
Im surprised that there is doubt that Vettori can be classified as an all-rounder.
The man has 3492 runs and 303 wickets! What more do you want?
Oh come on, we had to put up with Australia's Hussey crap, then Hughes and now Siddle. Why can't the NZ fans enjoy having a world class player for once.
Vettori is a better batsman than he is a bowler but he takes most of his wickets from bowling a truck load of overs and has a very poor strike rate for the frontline bowler of the NZ attack, head to head with Johnson and Johnson has him covered.
And with the 3000 runs and 300 wickets does that make Shane Warne an all rounder? He scored a few 50's in his day and a couple of 90's that should have been 100's but I would hardly call him an all rounder.
Nothing wrong with 2 spinners. Heck, SL are playing 3 in their latest match. With the flatness of pitches these days. Nothing wrong with 5 bowlers, especially if 2 are all-rounders. Especially if the top 5 and keeper is strong.
Keep the excuses rolling.