We want autoplay in BLC
- Thread starter imran102b
- Start date
I think not having autoplay is pretty good. If it was there i would use it i admit, but because it sint i will be mastering and perfecting my bowling until i can not do it anymore
In Test matches i beleive your bowlers would win you the game as you need to take 20 wickets to win a test match. In a ODI it is a batsman game as bowlers get hit to hit to all parts and score high totals. If you play a test match on BLIC you should have to win the game by right with your bowlers.
Good move codies. I will still be purchasing your game
In Test matches i beleive your bowlers would win you the game as you need to take 20 wickets to win a test match. In a ODI it is a batsman game as bowlers get hit to hit to all parts and score high totals. If you play a test match on BLIC you should have to win the game by right with your bowlers.
Good move codies. I will still be purchasing your game
andrew_nixon
Chairman of Selectors
If time is the issue, then the only sensible solution is to use save games. If time isn't an issue and you still autoplay, then you obviously just can't be bothered to play the game.
Mastering your bowling to the point where you'll be getting the opposition out for <100, then what do you do? Autoplay it so you can have a decent contest.... oh that's right- there is none! Roll in AI patchersJosha1210 said:
zimrahil
Retired Administrator
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2001
- Location
- Birmingham, England
- Online Cricket Games Owned
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Xbox 360
- Don Bradman Cricket 14 - Steam PC
brad352 said:
This is the whole crux of the matter - AI batting has to be good in BLIC
Time is not the issue. Timeliness is the issue. I don't want to wait for freaking a month for a test match to get over. Also I do not want to play a stupid twenty20. I want to bat my heart out in a test match.andrew_nixon said:
sachin
International Coach
If time isn't an issue and you still autoplay, then you obviously just can't be bothered to play the game.[/QUOTE]
No that would not be the case,or is not the case.I want to play the game and CAN be bothered playing it,but for certain bits i'd like to autoplay.It's more comfortable for me, and gets me more enjoyment out of the game.It will take me longer to get used to the game.And i don't believe any game at the moment could possibly satisfy anybody over a five day test match.
No that would not be the case,or is not the case.I want to play the game and CAN be bothered playing it,but for certain bits i'd like to autoplay.It's more comfortable for me, and gets me more enjoyment out of the game.It will take me longer to get used to the game.And i don't believe any game at the moment could possibly satisfy anybody over a five day test match.
fardin said:
not becoz people get bored of watching 50 over game.. We still have lot of fans for the 50 over ODI format! Its just that the Twenty20 can be a more better way to earn more money! Naturally people like a more faster way of finishing the game and would prefer the Twenty20 even more! And also it could be an attempt by the ICC to make the game short enough to compete with games like basketball, football, baseball, etc and get the audience from countries which support these type of games and have huge audience for these games!
50 over matches still have that huge audience! Thats wont go away one little bit! Even test matches between top ranking countries are very interesting to watch! Cricket is a very interesting game always!
fardin said:Andrew you seem to be loving a game with no autoplay
I am also with andrew!
indiancricketer
International Coach
If you guys Want auto play Go and buy CRICKET 2005....Auto play is for people who can't play....The way BLIC is been realise is good enough...Its better WITHOUT autoplay
An easy feature to implement like autoplay gives guys like me the ability to just bat completely and bowl for some overs. Guys like you can totally ignore the autoplay feature and bat and bowl completely. Its just another option (an important one as far as the sales of the game is concerned) in the game. How much more effort the codies developers would have had to take to put this option in? Its not rocket science or anything. And I am sure if the lousy HB studio guys can make it codies can make it with even great AI. People who don't like it can completely ignore it (is it too hard to do even that?).indiancricketer said:
I am sure the BLIC sales will be hurt due to lack of this feature. I am sure the game reviews will stress on the lack of this feature. Not having an autoplay feature in a game like cricket is inexcuseable how much ever you BLIC lovers try to defend it.
P.S. I am not an EA sports C2K5 lover too... It is still buggy... I just want to make a point that small things like this makes the difference between good game and great game.
Last edited:
indiancricketer said:
Well i knew that a few ppl on this forum are pro-Codemasters
but this just proves it.
If autopay is for ppl who cant play,then the AI of cricket 2005 must be greater than that of BLIC,isn't it?
rahulk666 said:
SMALL THINGS DO MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE SOMETIMES
I agree with you rahul
)
: .Similar threads
