TumTum
International Cricketer
I'd say that being given out caught when you don't hit it is a shocking decision.....
If you miss the ball by a considarable margin, than it is shocking. Like a few decisions in the Ind v SL Test.
I'd say that being given out caught when you don't hit it is a shocking decision.....
The 3rd umpire had no evidance to over turn the decision. It was most likely not out but none of us will never know.
Guyz don't be childish, you all know how the review system works
If you miss the ball by a considarable margin, than it is shocking. Like a few decisions in the Ind v SL Test.
Healy's asking Bollinger if he though Roach hit that. "Smashed it," says Bollinger, who admits they were a bit concerned with the review taking so long.
Ha.
"smashed it" is taking it a little too far, Bollinger.
it's only the players that are complicating it by asking for 50-50 decisions.
Again, pleaded guilty, avoided maximum penalty.Also Watson only getting a 15% fine is the biggest bullshit decision in the past year. Got to say they dohed that one up really badly.
The flaw is that no evidence = no overturn.
That is NOT a flaw, this is how the system works, to ONLY over turn SHOCKING decisions.
Bollinger is a right fat ugly prick. He will fit in perfectly with Johnson and Watson.
Also Watson only getting a 15% fine is the biggest bullshit decision in the past year. Got to say they fliped that one up really badly.
Again, pleaded guilty, avoided maximum penalty.
no evidence? it didnt show up on hot spot ..b/c.. umm... may be...idk.. he didnt NICK IT! hows that no evidence?