The PlanetCricket View: Which bowler deserves a shot at the Aussies?

Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Article by The Spin -

Whilst the Ashes so far, and particularly the second test, may have gone excellently for England, there is now something of an issue for the team to sort out. With Stuart Broad, a man expected to be at the forefront of England’s bowling attack, now unfortunately ruled out of the rest of the series with an injury, it is time to see what sort of depth England have available to them. Assuming that England don’t do an Australia and call up somebody nobody has ever heard of, there are three contenders for the place in the team: Chris Tremlett, Tim Bresnan and Ajmal Shahzad. None of them?made?it obvious with stunning performances in the recent tour match, so the question remains:?Who deserves their shot at this crucial stage of the series?



Chris Tremlett

The oldest of the three, Tremlett is best known for being the friendly giant. Standing at 6ft 7in, he is certainly an imposing figure and this height can give him tremendous bounce. On a traditional WACA pitch, he would be in his element, but the reports so far suggest the pitch in Perth is far less lively than it has been in previous years. In his 3 test matches so far, he has taken 13 wickets at an average of 29.69. Those three tests were back in the 2007 series against India and certainly are proof he is able to put in solid performances against big opposition. Since that series, though, he has suffered a spate of injuries which have hampered his international ambitions. Without those setbacks, it could be suggested he would now be a much bigger figure in England’s bowling options. His 2010 domestic season with new side Surrey saw him take 48 wickets as he certainly appears to be returning to the bowler people always hoped he would become. It may be thought, though, that he is too similar to Steven Finn to justify having both men in the same attack.

Tim Bresnan

The Yorkshireman is easily the most experienced of the three bowlers under consideration, with 5 tests, 33 ODIs and 13 T20 internationals under his belt, his swing bowling has certainly shown a degree of consistency on the international stage. Proof of his ability to handle pressure comes from his role in England’s successful T20 World Cup campaign, where he regularly opened the bowling ably. His test match abilities are open to questioning, though, with his 5 appearances coming against Bangladesh and a lacklustre West Indies. Even against this opposition, he only has a return of 14 wickets at an average of?35.14, though that could be in part down to having to bowl on lifeless Bangladeshi pitches, where he was actually the leading wicket taker of the seamers. He definitely?still has to disprove the notion that he is a limited overs specialist. He is a true allrounder, unlike his rivals, with a test match innings of 91 and a 27.44 batting average. Whilst this is unlikely to be the first concern, with the top order looking to be in such good form, it is certainly something unique which he offers.

Ajmal Shahzad

The youngest and least experienced, Shahzad has only played one test in his career, which came against Bangladesh this summer, taking 4 wickets. He has 94 first-class wickets at an average of 33.34 and has apparently impressed the England setup with his control and pace. If he is able to get the ball to reverse-swing, he could present an enormous challenge to the Australian batsmen, especially in working with Perth’s famous Freemantle Doctor winds. He will come firing in all day with his enthusiasm, but if the ball stubbornly refuses to move of the straight then his efforts could be a waste of time. It would also be considered a risk to throw him into an Ashes test when it would be ten times bigger than any match he has ever played in.

Conclusion

Who is selected will depend on what England are looking for. If they think the Perth pitch will get lively as usual before the test starts then Tremlett would be the perfect option. If they want to look towards experience, Bresnan is the man who fits the bill. If they think someone with enthusiasm and something a bit different is what they want to bring to the table, then Shahzad is the only option. Personally, I think Finn’s place rules out Tremlett and that Bresnan doesn’t bring enough in the Test match environment. My pick would be to give Shazad his opportunity to shine.

Who do you think is the right man for the job?



More...
 
Nice article although I disagree on Bresnan being a true allrounder.

If the pitch has pace and bounce, no harm in playing another bowler similar to Finn. It could actually work for England. Broad was a tall, hit-the-deck bowler and bowled fine along Finn.


But otherwise, Bresnan. Experience is useful, he can bat a bit which will help replace Broad's batting. And he's different to the other two seamers. Can hold up and end and keep runs down, which is basically what Broad did for the first two tests.
And if there is some movement in the air/off the pitch, then he's useful too.
 
anyone but Bresnan, the Aussies have seen enough of him and they are not loosing any sleep over him.
 
Chris Tremlett and Finn. The giants should go at it.
 
Torn between Tremlett and Shahzad, I would certainly rule out Bresnan as he's averaging 35.14 and that against the might of Bangladesh and West Indies

Bresnan (Tests)

2009 vs WIN : 3 wkts @ 32.33
09/10 vs BAN : 7 wkts @ 32.29
2010 vs BAN : 4 wkts @ 42.25

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at him being in the picture, his ODI average of 39.31 suggests 33 ODI caps is a joke too - that with 7 wkts @ 80.00 in ODIs against Australia

Bresnan (ODIs)

vs AUS : 7 wkts @ 80.00
vs PAK : 7 wkts @ 36.86
vs SAF : 3 wkts @ 40.67
vs SRI : 2 wkts @ 84.50

How does he con the selectors into picking him? Because he can bat a bit and bowl a bit?!?! Or maybe he is the new Ashley Giles, except Giles did make major contributions in about 3-4 series. Don't worry folks, I didn't post Bresnan's major ODI conquests. He has taken 11 wkts @ 18.73 against BANGLADESH and a handful of other wickets against the likes of Ireland, Scotland and West Indies so the talent is obviously just waiting to shine through :lol
 
I don't understand why so many people have to resort to sounding condescending to get their point across.

Surely if your point is valid or your statistics are sound, then that should be enough to show you're right without having to try and belittle those who disagree with you.

Seriously, it's a pain.


On that note, Bresnan hasn't played as many series as Giles, so the 'Giles made contributions in 3-4 series' argument isn't valid. Not to mention many of Bresnan's ODIs have come before the Strauss-Flower era, and that ODIs have no place in a Test discussion. And last but not least the fact that he was the best fast bowler in that Bangladesh vs. England series, which included Finn and Broad...

Cricket Records | Records | England in Bangladesh Test Series, 2009/10 | Most wickets | ESPN Cricinfo

And no one's calling for their heads.

As for against WI, he got only 7 overs for the whole of the first test, and 10 overs in the first innings of the second test, and then 14 in the final innings, where he took 3/45. Make of that what you will.

I generally agree that he's likely to be the least effective of the three options in terms of taking wickets, but disagree with the sentiment that he shouldn't be in the squad.
 
Tremlett, I haven't really seen much of Shahzad but Tremlett was pretty good against India even though that was ages ago now.
 
Seems like Tremlett has shown himself to be worthy of the trust put in him in the first day of action today, taking some good early wickets. What do you think now? Was it the right choice? Has he changed your mind?
 
I think Tremlett's probably booked his stay for good. When Broad comes back I think Finn gets chopped, because Tremlett hits the right length more consistently than Finn.
 
I think Tremlett's probably booked his stay for good. When Broad comes back I think Finn gets chopped, because Tremlett hits the right length more consistently than Finn.

My sentiments as well, Broad should be retained over Finn as he can actually bat when needed and helps shorten the tail. Also when Finn is wayward he pretty bad.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top