ronny_kingsley said:
Then how come Murlitharan broke their back at Lords with 17 wickets ???
Huh!? What series was this because Muralitharan didn't even play at Lords in their last tour to England! We've never professed to be great players of spin bowling anyway.
ronny_kingsley said:
Then how come they never win a series against India ??????
I guess this is sarcasm, because in 1990 and 1996 we won 1-0 in both series and the 2002 series 1-1
ronny_kingsley said:
Then how come they were Warney's bunny right through 1990's to even now ???????
Warne's a top class performer, who would be in any side.
ronny_kingsley said:
Someone might say that the team has changed from then on but hey guys team has changed for bad as far as batting is concerned.
None can replace in England Atherton, Stewart,Gooch,Gatting etc.
How can you say it has changed for the worse, did the team with Gatting, Stewart, Gooch and Atherton achieve what the current team has?
ronny_kingsley said:
As far as Lara and overstatment is concerned I still agreewith my earlier statement.
If Lara would have scored evn 40 runs and Windies would have won I would have called him gr8 but whats the use of that 400 where u team cant think of winning.It was his sheer greediness that costed them match. They could have won it provided Lara would have declared earlier.
If Lara is really that gr8 a batsman why the hell does Windies keep on loosing ????
Any answers dude
So just because of one innings and one match where he broke the world record AGAIN, he's over-rated?! Now, somebody correct me if i'm wrong, but how can you be over-rated when you've done that?
Like someone said, the West Indies side, other than Lara, Sarwan, Chanderpaul and Gayle (for tests) they are very, very average, you can't win unless you've got good bowlers, thats something the West Indies severely lack.
Kaif in the same league as Herchelle Gibbs? Can Kaif dominate an attack, can Kaif smash runs for fun whenever he feels like it?