Lee is sharper in the field.squiz said:Brett Lee is better is nearly every way compared to Rana :S. Batting, Bowling, not sure about fielding though
Pieterson ain't such a hot bowler, is he...Chigumbura smashed him for a couple of sixes last time he bowled...m_vaughan said:Gayle
Gilchrist
Pieterson
Flintoff
Cairns
Harmison
Can still bowl though, he has taken quite a few County Championship wickets.ZoraxDoom said:Pieterson ain't such a hot bowler, is he...Chigumbura smashed him for a couple of sixes last time he bowled...
Even Chanderpaul has a few domestic wickets...don't make him a useful bowlerBriggsey said:Can still bowl though, he has taken quite a few County Championship wickets.
Hot or not, fact still remains though that he can still bowl an over!!ZoraxDoom said:Even Chanderpaul has a few domestic wickets...don't make him a useful bowler![]()
He must have been a pretty bad batsman to start with if Lee has a higher average than him in all forms of the gameZoraxDoom said:Lee is sharper in the field.
But naved is way better with the bat(he started his career as a batter for heavens sake)
Lee is a better bowler but Rana is likely to be better in a slog...
Why do ya think he became a bowlersquiz said:He must have been a pretty bad batsman to start with if Lee has a higher average than him in all forms of the game